Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26589523›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2016

The Resource Identification Initiative: A Cultural Shift in Publishing.

Anita Bandrowski, Matthew Brush, Jeffery S Grethe, Melissa A Haendel, David N Kennedy, Sean Hill, Patrick R Hof, Maryann E Martone, Maaike Pols, Serena S Tan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. What's wrong with my experiment?: The impact of hidden variables on neuropsychopharmacology research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Mouse resources at the RIKEN BioResource Research Center and the National BioResource Project core facility in Japan.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anita BandrowskiCenter for Research in Biological Systems, UCSD, 9500 Gillman Dr.#0446, la Jolla, CA, 92093-0446, USA. abandrowski@ncmir.ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5497-0243
Matthew BrushOHSU Library, Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, 9500 Gillman Dr.#0446, la Jolla, CA, 92093-0446, USA.
Jeffery S GretheCenter for Research in Biological Systems, UCSD, 9500 Gillman Dr.#0446, la Jolla, CA, 92093-0446, USA.
Melissa A HaendelOHSU Library, Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, 9500 Gillman Dr.#0446, la Jolla, CA, 92093-0446, USA.
David N KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 365 Plantation Street, Biotech One, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Sean HillKarolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 15A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick R HofFishberg Department of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Maryann E MartoneCenter for Research in Biological Systems, UCSD, 9500 Gillman Dr.#0446, la Jolla, CA, 92093-0446, USA.
Maaike PolsScientific Outreach Executive, Faculty of 1000 Ltd, Middlesex House 34-42 Cleveland Street, London, W1T 4LB, United Kingdom.
Serena S TanJohn Wiley and Sons, 11 River St, Hoboken, NJ, 07030, USA.
Nicole WashingtonLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Elena Zudilova-Seinstra, Radarweg 29, 1043 NX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole VasilevskyOHSU Library, Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, 9500 Gillman Dr.#0446, la Jolla, CA, 92093-0446, USA.
RINL Resource Identification Initiative

Funding

NIDDK Network Coordinating UnitU24DK097771 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Shuibing Chen, Jeffrey S. Grethe · 2013 to 2026
$20.9M
Exposing the Deep Content of the Publication: Knowledge Extraction for Neuroimaging in Child PsychiatryR01MH083320 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRAZIER, JEAN A, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
OPERATION, SUPPORT AND STRATEGIC ENHANCEMENT OF THE NEUROSCIENCE INFORMATION FRAMEWORKU24DA039832 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GRETHE, JEFFREY S., MARTONE, MARYANN E · 2015 to 2016
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA039832NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097771NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, i.e., reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to identify the exact resources that are reported or to answer basic questions such as "How did other studies use resource X?" To address this issue, the Resource Identification Initiative was launched as a pilot project to improve the reporting standards for research resources in the methods sections of papers and thereby improve identifiability and scientific reproducibility. The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials. Authors were asked to include Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) in their manuscripts prior to publication for three resource types: antibodies, model organisms, and tools (i.e., software and databases). RRIDs are assigned by an authoritative database, for example a model organism database, for each type of resource. To make it easier for authors to obtain RRIDs, resources were aggregated from the appropriate databases and their RRIDs made available in a central web portal ( http://scicrunch.org/resources ). RRIDs meet three key criteria: they are machine readable, free to generate and access, and are consistent across publishers and journals. The pilot was launched in February of 2014 and over 300 papers have appeared that report RRIDs. The number of journals participating has expanded from the original 25 to more than 40 with RRIDs appearing in 62 different journals to date. Here, we present an overview of the pilot project and its outcomes to date. We show that authors are able to identify resources and are supportive of the goals of the project. Identifiability of the resources post-pilot showed a dramatic improvement for all three resource types, suggesting that the project has had a significant impact on identifiability of research resources.

Indexed as

CultureDatasets as TopicPublishingHealth ResourcesHumansNeurosciencesPilot ProjectsPubMedInformaticsReproducibilityRRID:nif-0000-25673RRID:nlx_153866

Identifiers

PMID26589523
PMCPMC5072392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.