ArticleNeuroinformatics2016
The Resource Identification Initiative: A Cultural Shift in Publishing.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A National Assessment of Cancer Center Shared Resources Metrics: Results from the First NACCSR Survey.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2026Article
- Article
- A perspective on FAIR quality control in multiplexed imaging data processing.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Making Biomedical Research Software FAIR: Actionable Step-by-step Guidelines with a User-support Tool.Scientific data · 2023Article
- A genomic data archive from the Network for Pancreatic Organ donors with Diabetes.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Detection of cell markers from single cell RNA-seq with sc2marker.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- What's wrong with my experiment?: The impact of hidden variables on neuropsychopharmacology research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Review
- MALDI-TOF-MS-Based Identification of Monoclonal Murine Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies within One Hour.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Mouse resources at the RIKEN BioResource Research Center and the National BioResource Project core facility in Japan.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022Review
- Project, toolkit, and database of neuroinformatics ecosystem: A summary of previous studies on "Frontiers in Neuroinformatics".Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Review
- Quantitative neuronal morphometry by supervised and unsupervised learning.STAR protocols · 2021Article
- Antibody Watch: Text mining antibody specificity from the literature.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Establishment and application of information resource of mutant mice in RIKEN BioResource Research Center.Laboratory animal research · 2021Review
- Antibody validation for protein expression on tissue slides: a protocol for immunohistochemistry.BioTechniques · 2020Article
- MonkeyCBP: A Toolbox for Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Monkey Brain.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- The Integrated Islet Distribution Program answers the call for improved human islet phenotyping and reporting of human islet characteristics in research articles.Diabetologia · 2019Article
- A snapshot of 3649 Web-based services published between 1994 and 2017 shows a decrease in availability after 2 years.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Contextual fear retrieval-induced Fos expression across early development in the rat: An analysis using established nervous system nomenclature ontology.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2018Article
- The Information Sharing Statement Grows Some Teeth.Neuroinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central tenet in support of research reproducibility is the ability to uniquely identify research resources, i.e., reagents, tools, and materials that are used to perform experiments. However, current reporting practices for research resources are insufficient to identify the exact resources that are reported or to answer basic questions such as "How did other studies use resource X?" To address this issue, the Resource Identification Initiative was launched as a pilot project to improve the reporting standards for research resources in the methods sections of papers and thereby improve identifiability and scientific reproducibility. The pilot engaged over 25 biomedical journal editors from most major publishers, as well as scientists and funding officials. Authors were asked to include Research Resource Identifiers (RRIDs) in their manuscripts prior to publication for three resource types: antibodies, model organisms, and tools (i.e., software and databases). RRIDs are assigned by an authoritative database, for example a model organism database, for each type of resource. To make it easier for authors to obtain RRIDs, resources were aggregated from the appropriate databases and their RRIDs made available in a central web portal ( http://scicrunch.org/resources ). RRIDs meet three key criteria: they are machine readable, free to generate and access, and are consistent across publishers and journals. The pilot was launched in February of 2014 and over 300 papers have appeared that report RRIDs. The number of journals participating has expanded from the original 25 to more than 40 with RRIDs appearing in 62 different journals to date. Here, we present an overview of the pilot project and its outcomes to date. We show that authors are able to identify resources and are supportive of the goals of the project. Identifiability of the resources post-pilot showed a dramatic improvement for all three resource types, suggesting that the project has had a significant impact on identifiability of research resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.