ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Large-scale machine learning for metagenomics sequence classification.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient and interpretable DNA/RNA representation using Komlós-Hadamard transforms.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- The application of machine learning in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Constructing inflammatory bowel disease diagnostic models based on k-mer and machine learning.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model for identifying key gut microbes and metabolites biomarkers associated with myasthenia gravis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- MetageNN: a memory-efficient neural network taxonomic classifier robust to sequencing errors and missing genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Machine learning for microbiologists.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024Review
- DSNetax: a deep learning species annotation method based on a deep-shallow parallel framework.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Metagenome-assembled genomes provide insight into the microbial taxonomy and ecology of the Buhera soda pans, Zimbabwe.PloS one · 2024Article
- HiTaxon: a hierarchical ensemble framework for taxonomic classification of short reads.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence: A Promising Tool in Exploring the Phytomicrobiome in Managing Disease and Promoting Plant Health.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Improving taxonomic classification with feature space balancing.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Metagenome analysis using the Kraken software suite.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- Binning Metagenomic Contigs Using Unsupervised Clustering and Reference Databases.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022Article
- Strain level microbial detection and quantification with applications to single cell metagenomics.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Mapping Data to Deep Understanding: Making the Most of the Deluge of SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequences.mSystems · 2022Article
- Predicting Tissue-Specific mRNA and Protein Abundance in Maize: A Machine Learning Approach.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Article
- Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications in Metagenomic Taxonomy and Functional Annotation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Informative Regions In Viral Genomes.Viruses · 2021Article
- Application of Deep Learning in Plant-Microbiota Association Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationMetagenomics characterizes the taxonomic diversity of microbial communities by sequencing DNA directly from an environmental sample. One of the main challenges in metagenomics data analysis is the binning step, where each sequenced read is assigned to a taxonomic clade. Because of the large volume of metagenomics datasets, binning methods need fast and accurate algorithms that can operate with reasonable computing requirements. While standard alignment-based methods provide state-of-the-art performance, compositional approaches that assign a taxonomic class to a DNA read based on the k-mers it contains have the potential to provide faster solutions.
resultsWe propose a new rank-flexible machine learning-based compositional approach for taxonomic assignment of metagenomics reads and show that it benefits from increasing the number of fragments sampled from reference genome to tune its parameters, up to a coverage of about 10, and from increasing the k-mer size to about 12. Tuning the method involves training machine learning models on about 10(8) samples in 10(7) dimensions, which is out of reach of standard softwares but can be done efficiently with modern implementations for large-scale machine learning. The resulting method is competitive in terms of accuracy with well-established alignment and composition-based tools for problems involving a small to moderate number of candidate species and for reasonable amounts of sequencing errors. We show, however, that machine learning-based compositional approaches are still limited in their ability to deal with problems involving a greater number of species and more sensitive to sequencing errors. We finally show that the new method outperforms the state-of-the-art in its ability to classify reads from species of lineage absent from the reference database and confirm that compositional approaches achieve faster prediction times, with a gain of 2-17 times with respect to the BWA-MEM short read mapper, depending on the number of candidate species and the level of sequencing noise. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and codes are available at http://cbio.ensmp.fr/largescalemetagenomics CONTACT: pierre.mahe@biomerieux.com SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.