Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26588991›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2015

Alternate wiring of a KNOXI genetic network underlies differences in leaf development of A. thaliana and C. hirsuta.

Madlen I Rast-Somssich, Suvi Broholm, Huw Jenkins, Claudia Canales, Daniela Vlad, Michiel Kwantes, Gemma Bilsborough, Raffaele Dello Ioio, Rob M Ewing, Patrick Laufs and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. CUC/auxin patterning of decanalised petal number inQuantitative plant biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A CUC1/auxin genetic module links cell polarity to patterned tissue growth and leaf shape diversity in crucifer plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Upregulation of aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Plant science's next top models.Annals of botany · 2020
    Review
  17. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Patterning a Leaf by Establishing Polarities.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Madlen I Rast-SomssichDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Suvi BroholmDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BR, United Kingdom;
Huw JenkinsDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BR, United Kingdom;
Claudia CanalesDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BR, United Kingdom;
Daniela VladDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BR, United Kingdom;
Michiel KwantesDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Gemma BilsboroughDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BR, United Kingdom;
Raffaele Dello IoioDipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università di Roma, Sapienza, 70-00185 Rome, Italy;
Rob M EwingCentre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom;
Patrick LaufsInstitut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, UMR1318, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut des Sciences et Industries du Vivant et de l'Environment (AgroParisTech), INRA Centre de Versailles-Grignon, 78026 Versailles Cedex 69117, France;
Peter HuijserDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Carolyn OhnoDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus G HeislerDevelopmental Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Angela HayDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Miltos TsiantisDepartment of Comparative Development and Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, 50829 Cologne, Germany;
Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEAgroParisTech · FRRoma Tre University · ITUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H006974/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H011455/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two interrelated problems in biology are understanding the regulatory logic and predictability of morphological evolution. Here, we studied these problems by comparing Arabidopsis thaliana, which has simple leaves, and its relative, Cardamine hirsuta, which has dissected leaves comprising leaflets. By transferring genes between the two species, we provide evidence for an inverse relationship between the pleiotropy of SHOOTMERISTEMLESS (STM) and BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP) homeobox genes and their ability to modify leaf form. We further show that cis-regulatory divergence of BP results in two alternative configurations of the genetic networks controlling leaf development. In C. hirsuta, ChBP is repressed by the microRNA164A (MIR164A)/ChCUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON (ChCUC) module and ChASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (ChAS1), thus creating cross-talk between MIR164A/CUC and AS1 that does not occur in A. thaliana. These different genetic architectures lead to divergent interactions of network components and growth regulation in each species. We suggest that certain regulatory genes with low pleiotropy are predisposed to readily integrate into or disengage from conserved genetic networks influencing organ geometry, thus rapidly altering their properties and contributing to morphological divergence.

Indexed as

Plant LeavesArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCardamineGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksHomeodomain ProteinsMicroRNAsPlant ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsKnox1 protein, plantMicroRNAsPlant ProteinsSTM protein, ArabidopsisCardamine hirsutacompound leafCUP-SHAPED COTYLEDONKNOXI genespleiotropyregulatory evolution

Identifiers

PMID26588991
PMCPMC4691893
OpenAlexW2178633682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.