Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26588577›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2015

Bacillus subtilis Bacteria Generate an Internal Mechanical Force within a Biofilm.

Carine Douarche, Jean-Marc Allain, Eric Raspaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Morphogenesis and mechanical properties ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Proliferating active matter.Nature reviews. Physics · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Probing the growth and mechanical properties ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carine DouarcheLaboratoire de Physique des Solides, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS-UMR 8502, Orsay Cedex, France.
Jean-Marc AllainLaboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, CNRS-UMR 7649, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
Eric RaspaudLaboratoire de Physique des Solides, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS-UMR 8502, Orsay Cedex, France. Electronic address: eric.raspaud@u-psud.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key issue in understanding why biofilms are the most prevalent mode of bacterial life is the origin of the degree of resistance and protection that bacteria gain from self-organizing into biofilm communities. Our experiments suggest that their mechanical properties are a key factor. Experiments on pellicles, or floating biofilms, of Bacillus subtilis showed that while they are multiplying and secreting extracellular substances, bacteria create an internal force (associated with a -80±25 Pa stress) within the biofilms, similar to the forces that self-equilibrate and strengthen plants, organs, and some engineered buildings. Here, we found that this force, or stress, is associated with growth-induced pressure. Our observations indicate that due to such forces, biofilms spread after any cut or ablation by up to 15-20% of their initial size. The force relaxes over very short timescales (tens of milliseconds). We conclude that this force helps bacteria to shape the biofilm, improve its mechanical resistance, and facilitate its invasion and self-repair.

Indexed as

BiofilmsStress, MechanicalBacillus subtilisPressure

Identifiers

PMID26588577
PMCPMC4656877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.