Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26588231›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2016

Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Updated Guidelines From the European Group on Tumor Markers.

György Sölétormos, Michael J Duffy, Suher Othman Abu Hassan, René H M Verheijen, Bengt Tholander, Robert C Bast, Katja N Gaarenstroom, Catharine M Sturgeon, Johannes M Bonfrer, Per Hyltoft Petersen and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
28.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Abnormal adnexal uptake inJournal of ovarian research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-MannoseJournal of proteome research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 10 countries.

György Sölétormos*Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Copenhagen North Zealand Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; †Clinical Research Centre, St Vincent's University Hospital and UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Bimolecular and Biomedical, Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Medical, Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; §Department of Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Uppsala, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden; ∥Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Gynecologic Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; ¶Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; #Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; **Senior Expert Clinical Laboratories, PUM Netherlands Senior Experts, Heemstede, the Netherlands; ††Norwegian Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories (NOKLUS), Section for General Practice, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; ‡‡Emeritus Scientist from Abbott, Limburg, Germany; §§Consultant, Centro Ippocrate, Bogliasco, Italy; ∥∥Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Center of Oncology - M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow Division, Poland; ¶¶Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark; and ##Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clinico, Barcelona, Spain.
Michael J Duffy
Suher Othman Abu Hassan
René H M Verheijen
Bengt Tholander
Robert C Bast
Katja N Gaarenstroom
Catharine M Sturgeon
Johannes M Bonfrer
Per Hyltoft Petersen
Hugo Troonen
Gian CarloTorre
Jan Kanty Kulpa
Malgorzata K Tuxen
Raphael Molina
University of Copenhagen · DKAbbott (Germany) · DEEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBIPB University · IDLeiden University Medical Center · NLSt. Vincent's University Hospital · IEThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Bergen · NOUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present an update of the European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for serum markers in epithelial ovarian cancer.

methodsSystematic literature survey from 2008 to 2013. The articles were evaluated by level of evidence and strength of recommendation.

resultsBecause of its low sensitivity (50-62% for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer) and limited specificity (94-98.5%), cancer antigen (CA) 125 (CA125) is not recommended as a screening test in asymptomatic women. The Risk of Malignancy Index, which includes CA125, transvaginal ultrasound, and menopausal status, is recommended for the differential diagnosis of a pelvic mass. Because human epididymis protein 4 has been reported to have superior specificity to CA125, especially in premenopausal women, it may be considered either alone or as part of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm, in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses, especially in such women. CA125 should be used to monitor response to first-line chemotherapy using the previously published criteria of the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup, that is, at least a 50% reduction of a pretreatment sample of 70 kU/L or greater. The value of CA125 in posttherapy surveillance is less clear. Although a prospective randomized trial concluded that early administration of chemotherapy based on increasing CA125 levels had no effect on survival, European Group on Tumor Markers state that monitoring with CA125 in this situation should occur, especially if the patient is a candidate for secondary cytoreductive surgery.

conclusionsAt present, CA125 remains the most important biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer, excluding tumors of mucinous origin.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisSocieties, ScientificBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID26588231
PMCPMC4679342
OpenAlexW2291806982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.