Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26588000›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Quantifying Stochastic Noise in Cultured Circadian Reporter Cells.

Peter C St John, Francis J Doyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Noise-driven cellular heterogeneity in circadian periodicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A systems theoretic approach to analysis and control of mammalian circadian dynamics.Chemical engineering research & design : transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers · 2016
    Article
  8. Functional network inference of the suprachiasmatic nucleus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter C St JohnDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Francis J DoyleDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.

Funding

MECHANISMS AND MODELING OF NETWORKED CIRCADIAN PACEMAKER SYNCHRONIZATIONR01GM096873 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DOYLE, FRANCIS J, HENSON, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM096873-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stochastic noise at the cellular level has been shown to play a fundamental role in circadian oscillations, influencing how groups of cells entrain to external cues and likely serving as the mechanism by which cell-autonomous rhythms are generated. Despite this importance, few studies have investigated how clock perturbations affect stochastic noise-even as increasing numbers of high-throughput screens categorize how gene knockdowns or small molecules can change clock period and amplitude. This absence is likely due to the difficulty associated with measuring cell-autonomous stochastic noise directly, which currently requires the careful collection and processing of single-cell data. In this study, we show that the damping rate of population-level bioluminescence recordings can serve as an accurate measure of overall stochastic noise, and one that can be applied to future and existing high-throughput circadian screens. Using cell-autonomous fibroblast data, we first show directly that higher noise at the single-cell results in faster damping at the population level. Next, we show that the damping rate of cultured cells can be changed in a dose-dependent fashion by small molecule modulators, and confirm that such a change can be explained by single-cell noise using a mathematical model. We further demonstrate the insights that can be gained by applying our method to a genome-wide siRNA screen, revealing that stochastic noise is altered independently from period, amplitude, and phase. Finally, we hypothesize that the unperturbed clock is highly optimized for robust rhythms, as very few gene perturbations are capable of simultaneously increasing amplitude and lowering stochastic noise. Ultimately, this study demonstrates the importance of considering the effect of circadian perturbations on stochastic noise, particularly with regard to the development of small-molecule circadian therapeutics.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsCells, CulturedCircadian RhythmComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene Knockdown TechniquesMiceRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingStochastic ProcessesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID26588000
PMCPMC4654518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.