Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26587650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Application of Cervical Collars - An Analysis of Practical Skills of Professional Emergency Medical Care Providers.

Michael Kreinest, Sarah Goller, Geraldine Rauch, Christian Frank, Bernhard Gliwitzky, Christoph G Wölfl, Stefan Matschke, Matthias Münzberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Analysis of spine motion during prehospital extrication procedures in motorsport.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Expertise of German paramedics concerning the prehospital treatment of patients with spinal trauma.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael KreinestBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Sarah GollerBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Geraldine RauchUniversity of Heidelberg, Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian FrankMittelbaden Clinic, Department for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Baden-Baden, Germany.
Bernhard GliwitzkyPHTLS Europe Research Group, Offenbach/Queich, Germany.
Christoph G WölflBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Stefan MatschkeBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Matthias MünzbergBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinikum Mittelbaden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveThe application of a cervical collar is a standard procedure in trauma patients in emergency medicine. It is often observed that cervical collars are applied incorrectly, resulting in reduced immobilization of the cervical spine. The objective of this study was to analyze the practical skills of trained professional rescue personnel concerning the application of cervical collars. MATERIAL AND

methodsWithin emergency medical conferences, n = 104 voluntary test subjects were asked to apply a cervical collar to a training doll, wherein each step that was performed received an evaluation. Furthermore, personal and occupational data of all study participants were collected using a questionnaire.

resultsThe test subjects included professional rescue personnel (80.8%) and emergency physicians (12.5%). The average occupational experience of all study participants in pre-clinical emergency care was 11.1±8.9 years. Most study participants had already attended a certified training on trauma care (61%) and felt "very confident" in handling a cervical collar (84%). 11% applied the cervical collar to the training doll without errors. The most common error consisted of incorrect adjustment of the size of the cervical collar (66%). No association was found between the correct application of the cervical collar and the occupational group of the test subjects (trained rescue personnel vs. emergency physicians) or the participation in certified trauma courses.

conclusionDespite pronounced subjective confidence regarding the application of cervical collars, this study allows the conclusion that there are general deficits in practical skills when cervical collars are applied. A critical assessment of the current training contents on the subject of trauma care must, therefore, be demanded.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBracesCervical VertebraeClinical CompetenceEmergency Medical TechniciansFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleManikinsMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularSplintsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26587650
PMCPMC4654515
OpenAlexW2172749569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.