Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26587405›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2015

Comparison of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Pulsed Radiofrequency Sympathectomy for Treating Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Bahram Naderi Nabi, Abbas Sedighinejad, Mohammad Haghighi, Gelareh Biazar, Masood Hashemi, Soodabeh Haddadi, Amirhossein Fathi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Practical Guidance and Challenges for Clinical Management.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Long-Term Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation as a Treatment for Ocular Pain.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bahram Naderi NabiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Abbas SedighinejadDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Mohammad HaghighiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Gelareh BiazarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Masood HashemiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soodabeh HaddadiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Amirhossein FathiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Guilan University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPainful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a long-term complication of type 1 and type 2 diabetes that majorly impacts quality of life. Its prevalence increases with age and duration of diabetes. It is more common in patients who have suboptimal glycemic control over several years. Because DPN may be resistant to conventional treatments, it is common for patients to only have partial pain relief. Therefore, new therapeutic options are needed for the condition.

objectivesThe aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) lumbar sympathectomy in treating painful DPN. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixty-five patients with painful DPN refractory to conventional treatment were randomly and evenly assigned to either the TENS or PRF lumbar sympathectomy groups. Pain evaluations were based on the 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Subjects were followed for three months and had a total of four study visits (baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment).

resultsSixty patients completed all study visits. In both groups, the NRS rating significantly decreased after treatment, with a marked pain reduction observed at the first follow-up evaluation. In the PRF group, the NRS decreased from 6.46 at baseline to 2.76 at the 1 week visit. One and 3 months after treatment, the NRS was 4.30 and 5.13, respectively (P < 0.0001). In the TENS group, the NRS decreased from 6.10 at baseline to 3.96 at the 1 week visit. One and 3 months after treatment, the NRS was 5.23 and 5.90, respectively (P < 0.0001). Unfortunately, the NRS steady increased almost back to baseline levels in the TENS group. The NRS only slightly increased during the follow-up period in the PRF group, but did not reach baseline levels.

conclusionsBoth TENS and PRF lumbar sympathectomy are promising pain relief treatments for painful DNP. However, PRF lumbar sympathectomy seems to have a superior efficacy. Further studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are needed.

Indexed as

Painful Diabetic NeuropathyPulsed Radiofrequency TreatmentsTENS

Identifiers

PMID26587405
PMCPMC4644305
OpenAlexW2236005394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.