Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26587350›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2015

Can we measure beauty? Computational evaluation of coral reef aesthetics.

Andreas F Haas, Marine Guibert, Anja Foerschner, Tim Co, Sandi Calhoun, Emma George, Mark Hatay, Elizabeth Dinsdale, Stuart A Sandin, Jennifer E Smith and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andreas F HaasDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Marine GuibertENSTA-ParisTech, Université de Paris-Saclay , Palaiseau , France.
Anja FoerschnerThe Getty Research Institute, Getty Center , Los Angeles, CA , United States.
Tim CoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Sandi CalhounDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Emma GeorgeDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Mark HatayDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Elizabeth DinsdaleDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Stuart A SandinScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego , San Diego, CA , United States.
Jennifer E SmithScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego , San Diego, CA , United States.
Mark J A VermeijCaribbean Research and Management of Biodiversity (CARMABI) , Willemstad , Curacao ; Aquatic Microbiology, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , Netherlands.
Ben FeltsDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Phillip DustanDepartment of Biology, College of Charleston , Charleston, SC , United States.
Peter SalamonDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.
Forest RohwerDepartment of Biology, San Diego State University , San Diego, CA , United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural beauty of coral reefs attracts millions of tourists worldwide resulting in substantial revenues for the adjoining economies. Although their visual appearance is a pivotal factor attracting humans to coral reefs current monitoring protocols exclusively target biogeochemical parameters, neglecting changes in their aesthetic appearance. Here we introduce a standardized computational approach to assess coral reef environments based on 109 visual features designed to evaluate the aesthetic appearance of art. The main feature groups include color intensity and diversity of the image, relative size, color, and distribution of discernable objects within the image, and texture. Specific coral reef aesthetic values combining all 109 features were calibrated against an established biogeochemical assessment (NCEAS) using machine learning algorithms. These values were generated for ∼2,100 random photographic images collected from 9 coral reef locations exposed to varying levels of anthropogenic influence across 2 ocean systems. Aesthetic values proved accurate predictors of the NCEAS scores (root mean square error < 5 for N ≥ 3) and significantly correlated to microbial abundance at each site. This shows that mathematical approaches designed to assess the aesthetic appearance of photographic images can be used as an inexpensive monitoring tool for coral reef ecosystems. It further suggests that human perception of aesthetics is not purely subjective but influenced by inherent reactions towards measurable visual cues. By quantifying aesthetic features of coral reef systems this method provides a cost efficient monitoring tool that targets one of the most important socioeconomic values of coral reefs directly tied to revenue for its local population.

Indexed as

AestheticsCoral reefImage analysisMachine learningReef degradation

Identifiers

PMID26587350
PMCPMC4647610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.