ArticlePeerJ2015
Can we measure beauty? Computational evaluation of coral reef aesthetics.
Article in PeerJ, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Global Systematic Literature Review of Ecosystem Services in Reef Environments.Environmental management · 2024Pooled it
- A control theory framework and in situ experimental platform for informing restoration of coral reefs.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Review
- Benthic communities on restored coral reefs confer equivalent aesthetic value to healthy reefs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ReScape: transforming coral-reefscape images for quantitative analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessing the aesthetic attractivity of European butterflies: A web-based survey protocol.PloS one · 2023Article
- Aesthetic value protection and tourism development of the world natural heritage sites: a literature review and implications for the world heritage karst sites.Heritage science · 2023Review
- The aesthetic value of reef fishes is globally mismatched to their conservation priorities.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Expanding conservation culturomics and iEcology from terrestrial to aquatic realms.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Species diversity and composition drive the aesthetic value of coral reef fish assemblages.Biology letters · 2019Article
- Identifying indicators of aesthetics in the Great Barrier Reef for the purposes of management.PloS one · 2019Article
- Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Review
- Using virtual reality to estimate aesthetic values of coral reefs.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Photosynthesis by marine algae produces sound, contributing to the daytime soundscape on coral reefs.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The natural beauty of coral reefs attracts millions of tourists worldwide resulting in substantial revenues for the adjoining economies. Although their visual appearance is a pivotal factor attracting humans to coral reefs current monitoring protocols exclusively target biogeochemical parameters, neglecting changes in their aesthetic appearance. Here we introduce a standardized computational approach to assess coral reef environments based on 109 visual features designed to evaluate the aesthetic appearance of art. The main feature groups include color intensity and diversity of the image, relative size, color, and distribution of discernable objects within the image, and texture. Specific coral reef aesthetic values combining all 109 features were calibrated against an established biogeochemical assessment (NCEAS) using machine learning algorithms. These values were generated for ∼2,100 random photographic images collected from 9 coral reef locations exposed to varying levels of anthropogenic influence across 2 ocean systems. Aesthetic values proved accurate predictors of the NCEAS scores (root mean square error < 5 for N ≥ 3) and significantly correlated to microbial abundance at each site. This shows that mathematical approaches designed to assess the aesthetic appearance of photographic images can be used as an inexpensive monitoring tool for coral reef ecosystems. It further suggests that human perception of aesthetics is not purely subjective but influenced by inherent reactions towards measurable visual cues. By quantifying aesthetic features of coral reef systems this method provides a cost efficient monitoring tool that targets one of the most important socioeconomic values of coral reefs directly tied to revenue for its local population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.