Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26587097›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2015

Effectiveness of a 40-minute Ophthalmologic Examination Teaching Session on Medical Student Learning.

Wirachin Hoonpongsimanont, Kambria Nguyen, Wu Deng, Dena Nasir, Bharath Chakravarthy, Shahram Lotfipour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wirachin HoonpongsimanontUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Irvine, California.
Kambria NguyenUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Irvine, California.
Wu DengUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Irvine, California.
Dena NasirUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Irvine, California.
Bharath ChakravarthyUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Irvine, California.
Shahram LotfipourUniversity of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Emergency Department, Irvine, California.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency physicians are among the few specialists besides ophthalmologists who commonly perform ophthalmologic examinations using the slit lamp and other instruments. However, most medical schools in the United States do not require an ophthalmology rotation upon completion. Teaching procedural skills to medical students can be challenging due to limited resources and instructor availability. Our study assesses the effectiveness of a 40-minute hands-on teaching session on ophthalmologic examination for medical students using only two instructors and low-cost equipment.

methodsWe performed an interventional study using a convenience sample of subjects. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires on students' confidence in performing ophthalmologic examination were administered. We used a paired t-test and Wilcoxon rank test to analyze the data.

resultsOf the 30 participants in the study, the mean age was 25 and the majority were first-year medical students. The students' confidence in performing every portion of the ophthalmologic exam increased significantly after the teaching session. We found that the average confidence level before the teaching session were below 2 on a 1-5 Likert scale (1 being the least confident). Confidence levels in using the slit lamp had the highest improvement among the skills taught (2.17 95% CI [1.84-2.49]). Students reported the least improvement in their confidence in assessing extraocular movements (0.73, 95% CI [0.30-1.71]) and examining pupillary function (0.73, 95% CI [0.42-1.04]). We observed the biggest difference in median confidence level in the use of the tonometer (4 with a p-value of <0.05).

conclusionA 40-minute structured hands-on training session can significantly improve students' confidence levels in ophthalmologic skills.

Indexed as

Physical ExaminationAdultClinical CompetenceEducationEducational MeasurementEducation, MedicalEmergency MedicineEye DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleOphthalmologyOphthalmoscopySlit LampSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaching

Identifiers

PMID26587097
PMCPMC4644041
OpenAlexW2178091518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.