ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2015
Evaluation of Social Media Use by Emergency Medicine Residents and Faculty.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAM) in emergency medicine: use and perceived clinical relevance from a large cross-sectional survey.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The #Tweetorial: an Underutilized Teaching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education?Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Residency Programs' use of social media in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- The influence of social media on recruitment to surgical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Describing the Digital Footprints or "Sociomes" of Asthma for Stakeholder Groups on Twitter.ATS scholar · 2020Article
- The Use of Social Media by Healthcare Quality Personnel in Saudi Arabia.Journal of environmental and public health · 2020Article
- What's All the Chatter? A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Emergency Physicians' Tweets.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2019Article
- Learning in the Digital Era - Awareness and Usage of Free Open Access Meducation among Emergency Department Doctors.Cureus · 2019Article
- Article
- Assessing the use of social media in physician assistant education.International journal of medical education · 2019Article
- Assessment of the Accuracy of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Videos in English on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA Resuscitation Guidelines.Emergency medicine international · 2019Article
- EMS providers do not use FOAM for education.International journal of emergency medicine · 2018Article
- A Descriptive Analysis of the Use of Twitter by Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018Article
- Journal clubs in the digital age: Twitter for continuing professional development.Future healthcare journal · 2017Article
- Social Media: Changing the Paradigm for Surgical Education.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017Review
- Social media as an open-learning resource in medical education: current perspectives.Advances in medical education and practice · 2017Review
- Derivation of Two Critical Appraisal Scores for Trainees to Evaluate Online Educational Resources: A METRIQ Study.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2016Article
- Improving awareness of several combination therapies for acute myeloid leukemia among oncology and hematology team members in Colorado, USA.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinicians and residency programs are increasing their use of social media (SM) websites for educational and promotional uses, yet little is known about the use of these sites by residents and faculty. The objective of the study is to assess patterns of SM use for personal and professional purposes among emergency medicine (EM) residents and faculty.
methodsIn this multi-site study, an 18-question survey was sent by e-mail to the residents and faculty in 14 EM programs and to the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) listserv via the online tool SurveyMonkey™. We compiled descriptive statistics, including assessment with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. StatsDirect software (v 2.8.0, StatsDirect, Cheshire, UK) was used for all analyses.
resultsWe received 1,314 responses: 63% of respondents were male, 40% were <30 years of age, 39% were between the ages 31 and 40, and 21% were older than 40. The study group consisted of 772 residents and 542 faculty members (15% were program directors, 21% were assistant or associate PDs, 45% were core faculty, and 19% held other faculty positions. Forty-four percent of respondents completed residency more than 10 years ago. Residents used SM markedly more than faculty for social interactions with family and friends (83% vs 65% [p<0.0001]), entertainment (61% vs 47% [p<0.0001]), and videos (42% vs 23% [p=0.0006]). Residents used Facebook™ and YouTube™ more often than faculty (86% vs 67% [p<0.001]; 53% vs 46% [p=0.01]), whereas residents used Twitter™ (19% vs 26% [p=0.005]) and LinkedIn™ (15% vs 32% [p<0.0001]) less than faculty. Overall, residents used SM sites more than faculty, notably in daily use (30% vs 24% [p<0.001]). For professional use, residents were most interested in its use for open positions/hiring (30% vs 18% [p<0.0001]) and videos (33% vs 26% [p=0.005]) and less interested than faculty with award postings (22% vs 33% [p<0.0001]) or publications (30% vs 38% [p=0.0007]).
conclusionEM residents and faculty have different patterns and interests in the personal and professional uses of social media. Awareness of these utilization patterns could benefit future educational endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.