Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586964›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2015

The safety of liposome bupivacaine following various routes of administration in animals.

Girish P Joshi, Gary Patou, Vladimir Kharitonov

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05868330 (A Feasibility Randomized Control Comparison of Peripheral Interscalene Catheter to Liposomal Bupivacaine Single Injection for Interscalene Blocks Used in Pain Control for Total Shoulder Arthroplasties), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05868330 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Feasibility Randomized Control Comparison of Peripheral Interscalene Catheter to Liposomal Bupivacaine Single Injection for Interscalene Blocks Used in Pain Control for Total Shoulder Arthroplasties

TypeinterventionalSponsorMelinda SeeringRan2024 to 2027Enrolled56ConditionsPost Operative Pain, Anesthesia, Nerve Block, Shoulder OsteoarthritisArmsInterscalene Catheter, Exparel Single Shot Interscalene Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multivesicular Liposome (Depofoam) in Human Diseases.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Use of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in an Incisional Pain Model in Rats (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Girish P JoshiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.
Gary PatouPacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Vladimir KharitonovPacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.
Pacira (United States) · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis report presents results from four preclinical studies evaluating safety and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of liposome bupivacaine following intravascular (intravenous [IV], intra-arterial [IA]), epidural, and intrathecal administration in dogs.

methodsIntravascular administration was initially tested in a pilot study to determine maximum tolerated doses, and then in an expanded study of systemic adverse effects and PKs. An epidural study compared properties of liposome bupivacaine alone and in combination with lidocaine/epinephrine vs bupivacaine HCl. Another study assessed effects after intrathecal administration.

resultsIn the initial intravascular studies, maximum doses at which no meaningful adverse events were observed with liposome bupivacaine were higher than for bupivacaine HCl (4.5 mg/kg IV vs 0.75 mg/kg IV, and 1.5 mg/kg IA vs 0.1 mg/kg IA, respectively). In the expanded intravascular study, there was no mortality or changes in pathology; adverse clinical signs included convulsions, lying on side, and decreased muscle tone (all were transient). In the epidural study, liposome bupivacaine was well tolerated at doses up to the highest dose tested (40 mg), with no evidence of spinal cord damage and with less motor blockade than bupivacaine HCl 15 mg. Intrathecal administration of liposome bupivacaine 40 mg was not associated with meaningful safety concerns and resulted in less motor blockade than bupivacaine HCl 15 mg. PK analyses showed that maximum plasma bupivacaine levels following administration of liposome bupivacaine (4.5 mg/kg IV and 40 mg epidural) were similar to maximum plasma bupivacaine levels following a threefold lower dose of bupivacaine HCl (1.5 mg/kg IV and 15 mg epidural).

conclusionLiposome bupivacaine has a favorable safety profile compared with bupivacaine HCl when administered to dogs via intravascular, epidural, and intrathecal routes. This favorable safety profile is likely related to the liposome-bound nature of bupivacaine in the liposome bupivacaine formulation.

Indexed as

bupivacainedrug administration routeslocal anesthesiaspinal injections

Identifiers

PMID26586964
PMCPMC4634838
OpenAlexW1954353454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.