Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586911›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2016

A method to test contractility of the supraspinatus muscle in mouse, rat, and rabbit.

Ana P Valencia, Shama R Iyer, Stephen J P Pratt, Mohit N Gilotra, Richard M Lovering

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana P ValenciaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Kinesiology, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland.
Shama R IyerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Stephen J P PrattDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Mohit N GilotraDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Richard M LoveringDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and rlovering@som.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training Program Muscle BiologyT32AR007592 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Aikaterini Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos · 1996 to 2026
$11.7M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND AGINGT32AG000268 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HAGBERG, JAMES M · 1999 to 2014
$2.5M
Mechanisms of Force Loss in Injured and Dystrophic Skeletal MuscleR01AR059179 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LOVERING, RICHARD M · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R-01-AR-059179NIAMS NIH HHS AR-07592-20NIA NIH HHS T32-AG-000268-15S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rotator cuff (RTC) muscles not only generate movement but also provide important shoulder joint stability. RTC tears, particularly in the supraspinatus muscle, are a common clinical problem. Despite some biological healing after RTC repair, persistent problems include poor functional outcomes with high retear rates after surgical repair. Animal models allow further exploration of the sequela of RTC injury such as fibrosis, inflammation, and fatty infiltration, but there are few options regarding contractility for mouse, rat, and rabbit. Histological findings can provide a "direct measure" of damage, but the most comprehensive measure of the overall health of the muscle is contractile force. However, information regarding normal supraspinatus size and contractile function is scarce. Animal models provide the means to compare muscle histology, imaging, and contractility within individual muscles in various models of injury and disease, but to date, most testing of animal contractile force has been limited primarily to hindlimb muscles. Here, we describe an in vivo method to assess contractility of the supraspinatus muscle and describe differences in methods and representative outcomes for mouse, rat, and rabbit.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle ContractionMuscular AtrophyMuscular DiseasesRabbitsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRotator Cuffmuscle forcemuscle functionrotator cuff

Identifiers

PMID26586911
PMCPMC4740501
OpenAlexW2175652935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.