ArticleBMC genetics2015
Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
Article in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Model Parameterisation and Variance Component Estimates on Genomic Predictions of Carcass Traits in Montana Composite Cattle.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Probabilities of two alleles being identity by state at unobserved loci predicted by observed loci in cattle populations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of GBLUP and WGBLUP in genomic selection for beef cattle under different LD patterns and mixed multi-population scenarios: a simulation study.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy with a Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Model Integrating Genome-Wide Association Study Results.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Weighted GBLUP in Simulated Beef Cattle Populations: Impact of Reference Population, Marker Density, and Heritability.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Investigating genotype by environment interaction for beef cattle fertility traits in commercial herds in northern Australia with multi-trait analysis.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Impacts of reference population size and methods on the accuracy of genomic prediction for fleece traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- A Mid-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Panel for Molecular Applications in Cowpea (International journal of genomics · 2024Article
- Accounting for overlapping annotations in genomic prediction models of complex traits.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Genomic dissection of repeatability considering additive and nonadditive genetic effects for semen production traits in beef and dairy bulls.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction in plants: opportunities for ensemble machine learning based approaches.F1000Research · 2022Article
- Genetics of Base Coat Colour Variations and Coat Colour-Patterns of the South African Nguni Cattle Investigated Using High-Density SNP Genotypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Exploring the size of reference population for expected accuracy of genomic prediction using simulated and real data in Japanese Black cattle.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- An evaluation of the predictive performance and mapping power of the BayesR model for genomic prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Genetic Dissection of Resistance to the Three Fungal Plant PathogensG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Genome-Wide Association and Regional Heritability Mapping of Plant Architecture, Lodging and Productivity inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- A novel linkage-disequilibrium corrected genomic relationship matrix for SNP-heritability estimation and genomic prediction.Heredity · 2018Article
- Development and validation of a small SNP panel for feed efficiency in beef cattle.Journal of animal science · 2018Article
- Identification and Validation of a New Source of Low Grain Cadmium Accumulation in Durum Wheat.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenetic variance that is not captured by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is due to imperfect linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs and quantitative trait loci (QTLs), and the extent of LD between SNPs and QTLs depends on different minor allele frequencies (MAF) between them. To evaluate the impact of MAF of QTLs on genomic evaluation, we performed a simulation study using real cattle genotype data.
methodsIn total, 1368 Japanese Black cattle and 592,034 SNPs (Illumina BovineHD BeadChip) were used. We simulated phenotypes using real genotypes under different scenarios, varying the MAF categories, QTL heritability, number of QTLs, and distribution of QTL effect. After generating true breeding values and phenotypes, QTL heritability was estimated and the prediction accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) was assessed under different SNP densities, prediction models, and population size by a reference-test validation design.
resultsThe extent of LD between SNPs and QTLs in this population was higher in the QTLs with high MAF than in those with low MAF. The effect of MAF of QTLs depended on the genetic architecture, evaluation strategy, and population size in genomic evaluation. In genetic architecture, genomic evaluation was affected by the MAF of QTLs combined with the QTL heritability and the distribution of QTL effect. The number of QTL was not affected on genomic evaluation if the number of QTL was more than 50. In the evaluation strategy, we showed that different SNP densities and prediction models affect the heritability estimation and genomic prediction and that this depends on the MAF of QTLs. In addition, accurate QTL heritability and GEBV were obtained using denser SNP information and the prediction model accounted for the SNPs with low and high MAFs. In population size, a large sample size is needed to increase the accuracy of GEBV.
conclusionThe MAF of QTL had an impact on heritability estimation and prediction accuracy. Most genetic variance can be captured using denser SNPs and the prediction model accounted for MAF, but a large sample size is needed to increase the accuracy of GEBV under all QTL MAF categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.