ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2016
Endurance Exercise and the Heart: Friend or Foe?
Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular evaluation of athletes ahead of participation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function 10 Years after the Ultra-Endurance Running Event Eco-Trail de ParisInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Protecting against sedentary lifestyle, left atrial enlargement and atrial fibrillation.Open heart · 2022Article
- Holter-determined arrhythmias in young elite athletes with suspected risk: Insights from a 20-year experience.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Targets identified from exercised heart: killing multiple birds with one stone.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Generalized Approach to Translating Exercise Tests and Prescribing Exercise.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2020Article
- Exercise benefits in cardiovascular disease: beyond attenuation of traditional risk factors.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2018Review
- High-Level Endurance Exercise: Are All Potential 'Cons' Justified?Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although low- to moderate-intensity exercise has well-known cardiovascular benefits, it has been increasingly suggested that prolonged strenuous endurance exercise (SEE) could have potential deleterious cardiac effects. In effect, the term 'cardiac overuse injury' (or 'over-exercise') has been recently reported to group all the possible deleterious cardiac consequences of repeated exposure to SEE or 'over-exercise'. In this article, we provide a balanced overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the 'pros' and 'cons' of SEE from a cardiological point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26586557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.