Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586334›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pharmacology2015

Effects of repeated quetiapine treatment on conditioned avoidance responding in rats.

Jun Gao, Min Feng, Natashia Swalve, Collin Davis, Nan Sui, Ming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun GaoKey Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, China; Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Min FengDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Natashia SwalveDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Collin DavisDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Nan SuiKey Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Electronic address: suin@psych.ac.cn.
Ming LiDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. Electronic address: mli2@unl.edu.

Funding

Behavioral mechanisms of antipsychotic actionR01MH085635 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI LI, MING · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085635NIMH NIH HHS R01MH085635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study characterized the behavioral mechanisms of avoidance-disruptive effect of quetiapine in the conditioned avoidance response test under two behavioral testing (2 warning signals vs. 1 warning signal) and two drug administration conditions (subcutaneous vs. intravenous). In Experiments 1 and 2, well-trained adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were tested under the subcutaneous (s.c.) quetiapine treatment (5.0, 15.0, 25.0, 50.0mg/kg) for 7 days in a novel procedure consisting of two conditioned stimuli (CS) (white noise serving as CS1 and pure tone as CS2). Only the highest dose (50.0mg/kg) produced a persistent suppression of the avoidance response without impairing the escape response. The magnitude of suppression of the CS1 avoidance was similar to that of CS2 avoidance. No significant group difference was found in the quetiapine (15.0mg/kg, s.c.) challenge test, indicating a lack of a long-term quetiapine effect. In Experiment 3, well-trained rats were tested under the intravenous (i.v.) quetiapine treatment (3.0, 9.0, 15.0mg/kg) for 5 days and challenged with quetiapine (6.0mg/kg, i.v. followed by 9.0mg/kg, s.c.). Only the white noise was used as the CS. Similar to what was being observed in Experiments 1 and 2, intravenously administered quetiapine dose-dependently suppressed avoidance responding during the drug test days, but did not alter drug sensitivity in the challenge days. Thus, quetiapine does not appear to show a preferential inhibition of the avoidance response to a less salient stimulus; and prior quetiapine treatment (s.c. and i.v.) does not cause a sensitization or tolerance to quetiapine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvoidance LearningConditioning, PsychologicalEscape ReactionMaleMotivationQuetiapine FumarateRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyQuetiapine FumarateConditioned avoidance responseCS1 and CS2QuetiapineSensitizationTolerance

Identifiers

PMID26586334
PMCPMC4679659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.