Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586325›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Managing uncertainty in advanced liver disease: a qualitative, multiperspective, serial interview study.

Barbara Kimbell, Kirsty Boyd, Marilyn Kendall, John Iredale, Scott A Murray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Therapeutic potential of oleanolic acid in liver diseases.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara KimbellPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Centre of Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kirsty BoydRoyal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Marilyn KendallPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Centre of Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
John IredaleThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Scott A MurrayPrimary Palliative Care Research Group, Centre of Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand the experiences and support needs of people with advanced liver disease and those of their lay and professional carers to inform improvements in the supportive and palliative care of this rapidly growing but currently neglected patient group.

designMultiperspective, serial interviews. We conducted up to three qualitative in-depth interviews with each patient and lay carer over 12 months and single interviews with case-linked healthcare professionals. Data were analysed using grounded theory techniques.

participantsPatients with advanced liver disease of diverse aetiologies recruited from an inpatient hepatology ward, and their lay carers and case-linked healthcare professionals nominated by the patients.

settingPrimary and secondary care in South-East Scotland.

results37 participants (15 patients, 11 lay and 11 professional carers) completed 51 individual and 13 joint patient-carer interviews. Nine patients died during the study. Uncertainty dominated experiences throughout the course of the illness, across patients' considerable physical, psychological, social and existential needs and affected patients, lay carers and professionals. This related to the nature of the condition, the unpredictability of physical deterioration and prognosis, poor communication and information-sharing, and complexities of care. The pervasive uncertainty also shaped patients' and lay carers' strategies for coping and impeded care planning. While patients' acute medical care was usually well coordinated, their ongoing care lacked structure and focus.

conclusionsLiving, dying and caring in advanced liver disease is dominated by pervasive, enduring and universally shared uncertainty. In the face of high levels of multidimensional patient distress, professionals must acknowledge this uncertainty in constructive ways that value its contribution to the person's coping approach. Pervasive uncertainty makes anticipatory care planning in advanced liver disease challenging, but planning 'just in case' is vital to ensure that patients receive timely and appropriate supportive and palliative care alongside effective management of this unpredictable illness.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSocial SupportAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversDisease ManagementFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareQualitative ResearchScotlandPALLIATIVE CAREQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID26586325
PMCPMC4654301
OpenAlexW2177529110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.