Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586317›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for migraine: a study protocol of a single-blinded placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial.

Aleksander Chaibi, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Peter J Tuchin, Michael Bjørn Russell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01741714 (Is Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy an Efficient Treatment Option for Migraine? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01741714 nacompletednot on this map

Is Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy an Efficient Treatment Option for Migraine? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2013 to 2015Enrolled104ConditionsMigraine With Aura, Migraine Without AuraArmsSham chiropractic manipulative therapy, Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aleksander ChaibiHead and Neck Research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
Jūratė Šaltytė BenthInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Nordbyhagen, Norway HØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Peter J TuchinDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael Bjørn RussellHead and Neck Research Group, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway Institute of Clinical Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMigraine affects 15% of the population, and has substantial health and socioeconomic costs. Pharmacological management is first-line treatment. However, acute and/or prophylactic medicine might not be tolerated due to side effects or contraindications. Thus, we aim to assess the efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) for migraineurs in a single-blinded placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial (RCT). METHOD AND ANALYSIS: According to the power calculations, 90 participants are needed in the RCT. Participants will be randomised into one of three groups: CSMT, placebo (sham manipulation) and control (usual non-manual management). The RCT consists of three stages: 1 month run-in, 3 months intervention and follow-up analyses at the end of the intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary end point is migraine frequency, while migraine duration, migraine intensity, headache index (frequency x duration x intensity) and medicine consumption are secondary end points. Primary analysis will assess a change in migraine frequency from baseline to the end of the intervention and follow-up, where the groups CSMT and placebo and CSMT and control will be compared. Owing to two group comparisons, p values below 0.025 will be considered statistically significant. For all secondary end points and analyses, a p value below 0.05 will be used. The results will be presented with the corresponding p values and 95% CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The RCT will follow the clinical trial guidelines from the International Headache Society. The Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics and the Norwegian Social Science Data Services have approved the project. Procedure will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki. The results will be published at scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01741714.

Indexed as

Manipulation, SpinalAdolescentAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPatient DropoutsSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID26586317
PMCPMC4654276
OpenAlexW2175499997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.