Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586136›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2016

Embolization of direct carotid cavernous fistulas with the novel double-balloon technique.

Yin Niu, Lin Li, Jun Tang, Gang Zhu, Zhi Chen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sustained trigeminocardiac reflex following balloon embolization of carotico-cavernous fistula.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yin NiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lin LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun TangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Gang ZhuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhi ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China southwesthpcz@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple endovascular management of direct carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) has been widely accepted as a treatment option. Embolization of the fistula with detachable balloons or thrombogenic coil-based occlusion has been the main choice to treat direct CCF, with good safety and efficacy. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of embolization of direct CCF with the novel double-balloon technique. A retrospective review of a prospective database on cerebral vascular disease was performed. We identified a total of five patients presenting with high-flow direct CCF. All patients were managed with transarterial embolization with the novel double-balloon technique. Three of the five patients were treated with two detachable balloons, and a completely occluded fistula with preservation of the internal carotid artery was achieved. Of the remaining two patients treated with more detachable balloons, one patient achieved a perfect outcome and the other one suffered from recurrent fistula due to balloon migration 3 weeks after embolization. During a follow-up period of 12-18 months, no symptoms reoccurred in any patient. Thus, the double-balloon treatment may be a promising method for CCF complete occlusion. This novel technique may bring more benefits in the following two cases: 1). A single inflated detachable balloon fails to completely occlude the CCF, which causing the next balloon can not pass into the fistula. 2). A giant CCF needs more balloons for fistula embolization.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAdultAngioplasty, BalloonCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid-Cavernous Sinus FistulaCavernous SinusCerebral AngiographyDatabases, FactualEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMalePatient SafetyProspective StudiesRecurrenceRetrospective Studiesdetachable balloonDirect CCFdouble-balloontransarterial embolization

Identifiers

PMID26586136
PMCPMC4984338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.