Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26586034›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Pancreas-preserving management in reinterventions for severe pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review.

Ahmed Fouad Bouras, Hélène Marin, Chafik Bouzid, François-René Pruvot, Philippe Zerbib, Stéphanie Truant

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed Fouad BourasDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Béthune, BP 10809, 62408, Béthune cedex, France. afouadbouras@gmail.com.
Hélène MarinDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, CHU de Lille, Université Nord de France, Rue Michel Polonovski, 59037, Lille, France.
Chafik BouzidDepartment of Oncological Surgery, Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, avenue Bouzenad Salem, 16000, Algiers, Algeria.
François-René PruvotDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, CHU de Lille, Université Nord de France, Rue Michel Polonovski, 59037, Lille, France.
Philippe ZerbibDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, CHU de Lille, Université Nord de France, Rue Michel Polonovski, 59037, Lille, France.
Stéphanie TruantDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, CHU de Lille, Université Nord de France, Rue Michel Polonovski, 59037, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLife-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (LTPOPF) is the most feared complication after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Although completion pancreatectomy (CP) is usually performed when radiological management fails, the associated morbidity and mortality rates remain high. Here, we reviewed pancreas-preserving alternatives to CP.

methodsThe PubMed database was systematically searched for publications between 1983 and 2014, describing pancreas-preserving surgical treatment of the pancreas remnant (PR) after reintervention in a context of post-PD LTPOPF.

resultsA total of 12 articles including 140 patients were reviewed. Six different types of pancreas-preserving treatment were described: external wirsungostomy, simple drainage of the PF, closure of pancreatic stump, internal wirsungostomy, partial CP, and salvage pancreatogastrostomy after major leakage of a pancreatojejunostomy. The overall median survival rate was 75 % but rose to 83 % when patients undergoing only surgical drainage of the fistula were excluded. The median complication rate was 75 %, and the median length of hospital stay was 41.5 days. Further reintervention was required for 25 % of the patients. The median incidence of late diabetes was 22.5 %. The incidence of exocrine insufficiency ranged from 0 to 100 % depending on the intervention.

conclusionPancreas-preserving surgical management of the PR after LTPOPF can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity. These data suggest that CP should have a more precisely specified role in the management algorithm and should not be performed systematically.

Indexed as

Organ Sparing TreatmentsHumansPancreatectomyPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationTreatment OutcomeGrade C fistulaPancreas-preserving managementPancreatic fistulaPancreatoduodenectomyReintervention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.