Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585975›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review.

J P H J Rutges, D H Kempen, M van Dijk, F C Oner

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03857295 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Clinical and Microbiological Analyses of Infections Following NeuroSurgery: a Retrospective, Single-center Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNeuromed IRCCSRan2019 to 2019Enrolled150ConditionsInfections Nervous System, Nosocomial Infection, Bacterial Infections, Antibiotic Resistant InfectionArmsNo interventions
NCT04436328 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: a Randomized Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2020 to 2022Enrolled300ConditionsVertebral Osteomyelitis, Spondylodiscitis, Surgical Procedure, UnspecifiedArmsSurgical treatment, Antimicrobial treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Influence of instrumentation type on outcomes after surgical management of spondylodiscitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J P H J RutgesDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.rutges@umcutrecht.nl.
D H KempenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M van DijkDepartment of Orthopaedics, St Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
F C OnerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DEOLVG · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpondylodiscitis is a spinal infection affecting primarily the intervertebral disk and the adjacent vertebral bodies. Currently many aspects of the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis are still a matter of debate. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review the currently available literature systematically to determine the outcome of patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis for conservative and surgical treatment strategies.

methodsA systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science regarding the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis was performed. Included articles were assessed on risk of bias according the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and the quality of evidence and strength of recommendation was evaluated according the GRADE approach.

results25 studies were included. Five studies had a high or moderate quality of evidence. One RCT suggest that 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis results in a similar outcome when compared to longer treatment duration. However, microorganism-specific studies suggest that at least 8 weeks of treatment is required for S. aureus and 8 weeks of Daptomycin for MRSA. The articles that described the outcome of surgical treatment strategies show that a large variety of surgical techniques can successfully treat spondylodiscitis. No additional long-term beneficial effect of surgical treatment could be shown in the studies comparing surgical versus antibiotic only treatment.

conclusionThere is a strong level of recommendation for 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment in pyogenic spondylodiscitis although this has only been shown by one recent RCT. If surgical treatment is indicated, it has been suggested by two prospective studies with strong level of recommendation that an isolated anterior approach could result in a better clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDiscitisFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresProspective StudiesSpineAnti-Bacterial AgentsOutcomePyogenicSpondylodiscitisSystematic reviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID26585975
OpenAlexW2174222035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.