Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585924›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry2016

Sulfatide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry for Screening of Metachromatic Leukodystrophy in Dried Blood and Urine Samples.

Zdenek Spacil, Arun Babu Kumar, Hsuan-Chieh Liao, Christiane Auray-Blais, Samantha Stark, Teryn R Suhr, C Ronald Scott, Frantisek Turecek, Michael H Gelb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 'Lenmeldy (OTL-200) in MLD: FDA's validation of advanced therapy'.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rare Diseases in Glycosphingolipid Metabolism.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Toward newborn screening of metachromatic leukodystrophy: results from analysis of over 27,000 newborn dried blood spots.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Zdenek SpacilDepartment of Chemistry, gelb@chem.washington.edu spacil@u.washington.edu.
Arun Babu KumarDepartment of Chemistry.
Hsuan-Chieh LiaoDepartment of Chemistry.
Christiane Auray-BlaisClinical Research Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, and Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada;
Samantha StarkNational Referral Laboratory, Genetics and Molecular Pathology, South Australia Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia;
Teryn R SuhrMLD Foundation, West Linn, OR.
C Ronald ScottDepartment of Pediatrics, and.
Frantisek TurecekDepartment of Chemistry.
Michael H GelbDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; gelb@chem.washington.edu spacil@u.washington.edu.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CACOPD Foundation · USPediatrics and Genetics · USSouth Australia Pathology · AUUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Multiplex Analysis of Inborn Errors of MetabolismR01DK067859 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GELB, MICHAEL H · 2003 to 2025
$9.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by deficiency in arylsulfatase A activity, leading to accumulation of sulfatide substrates. Diagnostic and monitoring procedures include demonstration of reduced arylsulfatase A activity in peripheral blood leukocytes or detection of sulfatides in urine. However, the development of a screening test is challenging because of instability of the enzyme in dried blood spots (DBS), the widespread occurrence of pseudodeficiency alleles, and the lack of available urine samples from newborn screening programs.

methodsWe measured individual sulfatide profiles in DBS and dried urine spots (DUS) from MLD patients with LC-MS/MS to identify markers with the discriminatory power to differentiate affected individuals from controls. We also developed a method for converting all sulfatide molecular species into a single species, allowing quantification in positive-ion mode upon derivatization.

resultsIn DBS from MLD patients, we found up to 23.2-fold and 5.1-fold differences in total sulfatide concentrations for early- and late-onset MLD, respectively, compared with controls and pseudodeficiencies. Corresponding DUS revealed up to 164-fold and 78-fold differences for early- and late-onset MLD patient samples compared with controls. The use of sulfatides converted to a single species simplified the analysis and increased detection sensitivity in positive-ion mode, providing a second option for sulfatide analysis.

conclusionsThis study of sulfatides in DBS and DUS suggests the feasibility of the mass spectrometry method for newborn screening of MLD and sets the stage for a larger-scale newborn screening pilot study.

Indexed as

Dried Blood Spot TestingChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansInfant, NewbornLeukodystrophy, MetachromaticMass SpectrometryNeonatal ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificitySulfoglycosphingolipidsSulfoglycosphingolipids

Identifiers

PMID26585924
PMCPMC4737087
OpenAlexW2177377315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.