ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2015
Latent class analysis suggests four distinct classes of complementary medicine users among women with breast cancer.
Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in integrative medicine and health consults: differences between cancer survivors and patients without cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Use of biologically-based complementary medicine in breast and gynecological cancer patients during systemic therapy.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Article
- Open to Exploration? Association of Personality Factors With Complementary Therapy Use After Breast Cancer Treatment.Integrative cancer therapies · 2018Article
- Application of latent class analysis in assessing the competency of physicians in China.BMC medical education · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer patients commonly report using >1 form of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). However, few studies have attempted to analyze predictors and outcomes of multiple CAM modalities. We sought to group breast cancer patients by clusters of type and intensity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use following diagnosis.
methodsDetailed CAM use following breast cancer diagnosis was assessed in 2002-2003 among 764 female residents of Long Island, New York diagnosed with breast cancer in 1996-1997. Latent class analysis (LCA) was applied to CAM modalities while taking into account frequency and intensities.
resultsFour distinct latent classes of CAM use emerged: 1) "Low-dose supplement users" (40%), who used only common nutritional supplements; 2) "Vitamin/mineral supplement users" (39%), using an abundance of supplements in addition to other practices; 3) "Mind-body medicine users" (12%), with near-universal use of supplements, mind-body medicine techniques, and massage; and 4) "Multi-modality high-dose users" (9%), who were highly likely to use nearly all types of CAM. Predictors of membership in classes with substantial CAM use included younger age, more education, higher income, Jewish religion, ideal body mass index, higher fruit and vegetable intake, higher levels of physical activity, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, and prior use of oral contraceptives.
conclusionsLCA identified important subgroups of breast cancer patients characterized by varying degrees of complementary therapy use. Further research should explore the reproducibility of these classes and investigate the association between latent class membership and breast cancer outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.