Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585767›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia2016

Rethinking general anesthesia for cesarean section.

Hiroyiki Sumikura, Hidetomo Niwa, Masaki Sato, Tatsuo Nakamoto, Takashi Asai, Satoshi Hagihira

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06160583 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

General Anesthesia in Obstetric Patients for Cesarean Section, Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2023 to 2024Enrolled5,000ConditionsAnesthesia, Perinatal Morbidity, Maternal-Fetal Relations
NCT07363109 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia With Fixed-rate Metaraminol Infusion Versus Fixed-rate Norepinephrine Infusion: A Double-blind Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAretaieion University HospitalRan2026 to 2029Enrolled80ConditionsHypotension After Spinal Anesthesia, Hypotension During Cesarean DeliveryArmsMetaraminol infusion, Norepinephrine infusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroyiki SumikuraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University, 3-1-3 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. hiroyuki.sumikura@gmail.com.
Hidetomo NiwaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.
Masaki SatoDepartment of Anesthesiology, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan.
Tatsuo NakamotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Shin-machi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Takashi AsaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50 Minamikoshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
Satoshi HagihiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPHirosaki University · JPJuntendo University · JPKansai Medical University · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we describe the current consensus surrounding general anesthetic management for cesarean section. For induction of anesthesia, rapid-sequence induction using thiopental and suxamethonium has been the recommended standard for a long time. In recent years, induction of anesthesia using propofol, rocuronium, and remifentanil have been gaining popularity. To prevent aspiration pneumonia, a prolonged preoperative fasting and an application of cricoid pressure during induction of anesthesia have been recommended, but these practices may require revision. Guidelines for difficult airway management were developed first in obstetric anesthesia, and the use of a supraglottic airway is now recognized as an effective rescue device. After the delivery of a fetus, switching from volatile anesthetics to intravenous anesthetics has been recommended to avoid uterine atony. At the same time, intraoperative awareness should be avoided. The rate of persistent wound pain is higher when only general anesthesia was used during cesarean section than with regional anesthesia, and thus it is necessary to provide a sufficient postoperative analgesia using multimodal analgesia, including intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, non-steroidal inflammatory drugs, and acetaminophen.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthetics, IntravenousCesarean SectionFemaleHumansIntraoperative AwarenessPostoperative PainPregnancyAnesthetics, IntravenousAirway managementCesarean sectionIntraoperative awarenessRapid-sequence induction

Identifiers

PMID26585767
OpenAlexW2172869548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.