Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585439›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2016

Inclusion of brain volume loss in a revised measure of 'no evidence of disease activity' (NEDA-4) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Ludwig Kappos, Nicola De Stefano, Mark S Freedman, Bruce Ac Cree, Ernst-Wilhelm Radue, Till Sprenger, Maria Pia Sormani, Terence Smith, Dieter A Häring, Daniela Piani Meier and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04153773 (Retinal Thickness as a Potential Biomarker of Neurodegeneration and Early Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 131 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04153773 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Retinal Thickness as a Potential Biomarker of Neurodegeneration and Early Cognitive Impairment in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

TypeobservationalSponsorMansoura University HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled90ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsOCT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pediatric multiple sclerosis: Improving outcome through high-efficacy therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ludwig KapposNeurology, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland ludwig.kappos@usb.ch.
Nicola De StefanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Mark S FreedmanUniversity of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bruce Ac CreeMultiple Sclerosis Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ernst-Wilhelm RadueMedical Image Analysis Centre, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Till SprengerMedical Image Analysis Centre, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Maria Pia SormaniBiostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Terence SmithOxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK.
Dieter A HäringNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniela Piani MeierNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Davorka TomicNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'No evidence of disease activity' (NEDA), defined as absence of magnetic resonance imaging activity (T2 and/or gadolinium-enhanced T1 lesions), relapses and disability progression ('NEDA-3'), is used as a comprehensive measure of treatment response in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), but is weighted towards inflammatory activity. Accelerated brain volume loss (BVL) occurs in RMS and is an objective measure of disease worsening and progression.

objectiveTo assess the contribution of individual components of NEDA-3 and the impact of adding BVL to NEDA-3 ('NEDA-4')

methodsWe analysed data pooled from two placebo-controlled phase 3 fingolimod trials in RMS and assessed NEDA-4 using different annual BVL mean rate thresholds (0.2%-1.2%).

resultsAt 2 years, 31.0% (217/700) of patients receiving fingolimod 0.5 mg achieved NEDA-3 versus 9.9% (71/715) on placebo (odds ratio (OR) 4.07; p < 0.0001). Adding BVL (threshold of 0.4%), the respective proportions of patients achieving NEDA-4 were 19.7% (139/706) and 5.3% (38/721; OR 4.41; p < 0.0001). NEDA-4 status favoured fingolimod across all BVL thresholds tested (OR 4.01-4.41; p < 0.0001).

conclusionNEDA-4 has the potential to capture the impact of therapies on both inflammation and neurodegeneration, and deserves further evaluation across different compounds and in long-term studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAtrophyBrainClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingOrgan SizeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive AgentsAtrophybrainfingolimodmultiple sclerosisNEDA

Identifiers

PMID26585439
PMCPMC5015759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.