Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Efficient long-term survival of cell grafts after myocardial infarction with thick viable cardiac tissue entirely from pluripotent stem cells.

Takehiko Matsuo, Hidetoshi Masumoto, Shuhei Tajima, Takeshi Ikuno, Shiori Katayama, Kenji Minakata, Tadashi Ikeda, Kohei Yamamizu, Yasuhiko Tabata, Ryuzo Sakata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Progress in preclinical research on induced pluripotent stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Biomaterial-Assisted Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takehiko MatsuoDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Hidetoshi MasumotoDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shuhei TajimaDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi IkunoDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Shiori KatayamaDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenji MinakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tadashi IkedaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kohei YamamizuDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuhiko TabataDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Ryuzo SakataDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Jun K YamashitaDepartment of Cell Growth and Differentiation, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor engraftment of cells after transplantation to the heart is a common and unresolved problem in the cardiac cell therapies. We previously generated cardiovascular cell sheets entirely from pluripotent stem cells with cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells and vascular mural cells. Though sheet transplantation showed a better engraftment and improved cardiac function after myocardial infarction, stacking limitation (up to 3 sheets) by hypoxia hampered larger structure formation and long-term survival of the grafts. Here we report an efficient method to overcome the stacking limitation. Insertion of gelatin hydrogel microspheres (GHMs) between each cardiovascular cell sheet broke the viable limitation via appropriate spacing and fluid impregnation with GHMs. Fifteen sheets with GHMs (15-GHM construct; >1 mm thickness) were stacked within several hours and viable after 1 week in vitro. Transplantation of 5-GHM constructs (≈2 × 10(6) of total cells) to a rat myocardial infarction model showed rapid and sustained functional improvements. The grafts were efficiently engrafted as multiple layered cardiovascular cells accompanied by functional capillary networks. Large engrafted cardiac tissues (0.8 mm thickness with 40 cell layers) successfully survived 3 months after TX. We developed an efficient method to generate thicker viable tissue structures and achieve long-term survival of the cell graft to the heart.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedCell TransplantationEndothelial CellsGelatinGraft SurvivalHeart Function TestsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrospheresMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacGelatinHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID26585309
PMCPMC4653625
OpenAlexW2357782771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.