Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585282›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2015

Specialized and Generalized Pollen-Collection Strategies in an Ancient Bee Lineage.

Torsten Wappler, Conrad C Labandeira, Michael S Engel, Reinhard Zetter, Friðgeir Grímsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The earliest large carpenter bee (Palaeobiodiversity and palaeoenvironments · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pollination of Cretaceous flowers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Torsten WapplerSteinmann Institute, University of Bonn, Nussallee 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: twappler@uni-bonn.de.
Conrad C LabandeiraDepartment of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA; Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; College of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China. Electronic address: labandec@si.edu.
Michael S EngelDivision of Entomology, Natural History Museum, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA; Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA; Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Reinhard ZetterDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14 (UZAII), 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Friðgeir GrímssonDepartment of Palaeontology, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14 (UZAII), 1090 Vienna, Austria.
University of Vienna · ATAmerican Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iconic examples of insect pollination have emphasized narrowly specialized pollinator mutualisms such as figs and fig wasps and yuccas and yucca moths. However, recent attention by pollination ecologists has focused on the broad spectra of pollinated plants by generalist pollinators such as bees. Bees have great impact for formulating hypotheses regarding specialization versus generalization in pollination mutualisms. We report the pollination biology of six northern European species of an extinct tribe of pollen-basket-bearing apine bees, Electrapini, of early-middle Eocene age, examined from two deposits of 48 and 44 million years in age. These bees exhibit a pattern of generalized, incidental pollen occurring randomly on their heads, thoraces, and abdomens, obtained from diverse, nectar-bearing plants. By contrast, a more restricted suite of pollen was acquired for metatibial pollen baskets (corbiculae) of the same bee taxa from a taxonomically much narrower suite of arborescent, evergreen hosts with uniform flower structure. The stereotyped plant sources of the specialist strategy of pollen collection consisted of pentamerous, radially symmetrical flowers with a conspicuous gynoecium surrounded by prominent nectar reward, organized in structurally similar compound inflorescences. Pollen specialization in bees occurs not for efficient pollination but rather in the corbiculate Electrapini as food for bee larvae (brood) and involves packing corbiculae with moistened pollen that rapidly loses viability with age. This specialist strategy was a well-developed preference by the early Eocene, providing a geochronologic midpoint assessment of bee pollen-collection strategies.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPollinationSymbiosisAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBeesFossilsGermanyMagnoliopsidaPollen

Identifiers

PMID26585282
PMCPMC6485464
OpenAlexW2125866013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.