Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26585231›Full record

ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2015

Sensitization of Pancreatic Cancers to Gemcitabine Chemoradiation by WEE1 Kinase Inhibition Depends on Homologous Recombination Repair.

Tasneem Kausar, Jason S Schreiber, David Karnak, Leslie A Parsels, Joshua D Parsels, Mary A Davis, Lili Zhao, Jonathan Maybaum, Theodore S Lawrence, Meredith A Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Landscape and Therapeutic Targeting ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tasneem KausarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Jason S SchreiberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
David KarnakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Leslie A ParselsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Joshua D ParselsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Mary A DavisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Lili ZhaoBiostatistics Unit, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Jonathan MaybaumDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Theodore S LawrenceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Meredith A MorganDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Electronic address: mmccrack@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Translational Research in GI CancerP50CA130810 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRENNER, DEAN E. · 2010 to 2016
$11.8M
Mechanism-Based Use of Chk1 Inhibitors in Pancreas CancerR01CA138723 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAWRENCE, THEODORE S, MAYBAUM, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2015
$2.0M
Selective Sensitization of Pancreatic Cancer to Therapy by Chk1 and PARP1 InhibitR01CA163895 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORGAN, MEREDITH A · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS P50 CA130810NCI NIH HHS P50CA130810NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138723NCI NIH HHS R01CA138723NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163895NCI NIH HHS R01CA163895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the efficacy of chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and begin to establish patient selection criteria, we investigated the combination of the WEE1 inhibitor AZD1775 with gemcitabine-radiation in homologous recombination (HR) repair proficient and deficient pancreatic cancers. Sensitization to gemcitabine-radiation by AZD1775 was assessed in pancreatic cancer cells by clonogenic survival and in patient-derived xenografts by tumor growth. The contributions of HR repair inhibition and G2 checkpoint abrogation to sensitization were assessed by γH2AX, BRCA2 manipulation, and RAD51 focus formation and pHistone H3 flow cytometry, respectively. We found that AZD1775 sensitized to gemcitabine-radiation in BRCA2 wild-type but not BRCA2 mutant pancreatic cancer cells. In all cells, AZD1775 caused inhibition of CDK1 phosphorylation and G2 checkpoint abrogation. However, sensitization by AZD1775 was associated with persistent γH2AX and inhibition of RAD51 focus formation. In HR-proficient (BRCA2 wild-type) or -deficient (BRAC2 null) isogenic cells, AZD1775 sensitized to gemcitabine-radiation in BRCA2 wild-type, but not in BRCA2 null cells, despite significant G2 checkpoint abrogation. In patient-derived pancreatic tumor xenografts, AZD1775 significantly inhibited tumor growth and impaired RAD51 focus formation in response to gemcitabine-radiation. In conclusion, WEE1 inhibition by AZD1775 is an effective strategy for sensitizing pancreatic cancers to gemcitabine chemoradiation. Although this sensitization is accompanied by inhibition of CDK1 phosphorylation and G2 checkpoint abrogation, this mechanism is not sufficient for sensitization. Our findings demonstrate that sensitization to chemoradiation by WEE1 inhibition results from inhibition of HR repair and suggest that patient tumors without underlying HR defects would benefit most from this therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBlotting, WesternCell Cycle ProteinsCell ProliferationChemoradiotherapyDeoxycytidineDNA DamageFemaleFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGemcitabineHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMiceMice, NudeCell Cycle ProteinsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineNuclear ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsWEE1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26585231
PMCPMC4656803
OpenAlexW2176143223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.