Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26584735›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Validation of a measure of health-related production loss: construct validity and responsiveness - a cohort study.

Malin Lohela Karlsson, Hillevi Busch, Emmanuel Aboagye, Irene Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Do Attitudes towards Work or Work Motivation Affect Productivity Loss among Academic Employees?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malin Lohela KarlssonUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research (IIR), Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. malin.lohela.karlsson@ki.se.
Hillevi BuschUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research (IIR), Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emmanuel AboagyeUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research (IIR), Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Irene JensenUnit of Intervention and Implementation Research (IIR), Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet, SE 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate the construct validity and responsiveness of a Swedish measure of health-related production loss as well as to investigate if there is a difference in the level of production loss within a population suffering from persistent back/neck pain and CMDs.

methodsThe sample was drawn from a study that assessed employees' health and working capacity in 74 health care units before and after intervention. The study included 692 patients who reported working the previous six months at baseline measurement, and who were also asked to answer questions related to health-related production loss. Health-related measures were general health derived from Short Form-12, health-related quality of life derived from EQ-5D, and work ability derived from the Work Ability Index (WAI). Convergent validity and external responsiveness were assessed using Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient and a linear regression model, respectively.

resultsThe different measures of health showed a moderate-to-strong correlation with the measure of health-related production loss and fulfilled the criteria for construct validity. Changes in health and work ability led to significant changes in health-related production loss, which demonstrates external responsiveness. This result is valid for both the total population and for the two different subgroups that were evaluated.

conclusionsThe present study shows that this measure of health-related production loss is a valid measure for capturing production loss due to illness, and that work ability is more strongly correlated with health-related production loss than people's general health is. The result shows an average of about 50 % reduced production due to illness, with back pain being the most costly.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth StatusQuality of LifeAdultBack PainCohort StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainOccupational HealthReproducibility of ResultsStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26584735
PMCPMC4653835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.