ArticleRetinal cases & brief reports2016
MULTIMODAL IMAGING OF A FAMILY WITH SPINOCEREBELLAR ATAXIA TYPE 7 DEMONSTRATING PHENOTYPIC VARIATION AND PROGRESSION OF RETINAL DEGENERATION.
Article in Retinal cases & brief reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal Ophthalmic Imaging in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Proposal for Classification of Retinal Degeneration in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2021Observational
- Progress of macular atrophy during 30 months' follow-up in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type1 (SCA1).Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Ophthalmic Manifestations and Genetics of the Polyglutamine Autosomal Dominant Spinocerebellar Ataxias: A Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo report the variability and progression of clinical presentation in three family members with spinocerebellar ataxia Type 7 including early recognizable features on retinal imaging and magnetic resonance imaging.
methodsRetrospective case series.
resultsThe proband, Patient 1 (mother) presented at age 26 with light perception vision. Initial examination was significant for optic disc pallor, vascular attenuation, and central macular atrophy. Two years later, her vision declined to no light perception, and fundus examination demonstrated marked progression of macular atrophy and peripheral bone spicule formation. Seven years after the onset of vision loss, neurologic examination demonstrated ataxia, dysarthria, and slowed saccades. Genetic testing of ATXN7 identified heterozygous 61-CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion confirming the diagnosis of spinocerebellar ataxia Type 7. Patient 2 (son) presented at age 11 with visual acuity of 20/300 bilaterally and decreased color vision. Funduscopic examination was notable for disc pallor, vascular attenuation, and peripheral pigmentary changes. Electroretinography demonstrated diminished rod and cone function, and Goldmann visual field testing revealed paracentral scotoma. Patient 3 (daughter) presented at age 14 with visual acuity of 20/50 bilaterally and minimal funduscopic changes. The only significant ophthalmic finding was retinal thinning with atrophy of the outer nuclear layer and subfoveal ellipsoid zone on optical coherence tomography. Early cerebellar volume loss was also noted on magnetic resonance imaging.
conclusionThe clinical presentation of spinocerebellar ataxia Type 7 can vary widely even within the same family. In individuals with vision loss and normal fundus examination, careful evaluation of optical coherence tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging facilitates early diagnosis and genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.