ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016
Monitoring the respiratory rate by miniature motion sensors in premature infants: a comparative study.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring reference standards for the measurement of respiratory rate in children under 5 years of age: a scoping review.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Imbalanced feature generation based on bootstrap power spectral curve for estimating respiratory rate.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Imbalanced Power Spectral Generation for Respiratory Rate and Uncertainty Estimations Based on Photoplethysmography Signal.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Contactless Monitoring System Versus Gold Standard for Respiratory Rate Monitoring in Emergency Department Patients: Pilot Comparison Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Video-Based Respiratory Rate Estimation for Infants in the NICU.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024Article
- Multi-Modal Portable Respiratory Rate Monitoring Device for Childhood Pneumonia Detection.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Dual-Sensor Signals Based Exact Gaussian Process-Assisted Hybrid Feature Extraction and Weighted Feature Fusion for Respiratory Rate and Uncertainty Estimations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Detection of Breathing Movements of Preterm Neonates by Recording Their Abdominal Movements with a Time-of-Flight Camera.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Feasibility of non-contact cardiorespiratory monitoring using impulse-radio ultra-wideband radar in the neonatal intensive care unit.PloS one · 2020Article
- Respiratory Rate Monitoring in Clinical Environments with a Contactless Ultra-Wideband Impulse Radar-based Sensor System.Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · 2020Article
- Continuous Monitoring of Respiratory Rate in Emergency Admissions: Evaluation of the RespiraSense™ Sensor in Acute Care Compared to the Industry Standard and Gold Standard.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveExisting respiratory rate (RR) monitors suffer from inaccuracy. The study assesses the accuracy of a novel modality that monitors lung ventilation with miniature motion sensors. STUDY
designRR was measured by three methods: impedance technology, motion sensors and visual count, in babies (n=9) that breathed spontaneously or with respiratory support and babies (n=12) that received high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV).
resultsA line close to equality (slope=0.96, r(2)=0.83) was obtained between the motion sensor and the visual count of the RR with narrow 95% limits of agreements (<14.0 b.p.m.). The relationship between the impedance and the visual count showed a lower correlation (r(2)=0.65) and wider 95% limits of agreements (21.4 b.p.m.). The motion sensor- and the ventilator-determined RRs demonstrated a good agreement during HFOV, whereas the impedance failed to measure the RR during HFOV.
conclusionMonitoring RR with motion sensors is more accurate compared with the impedance, in infants, in all ventilation modes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.