Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26583264›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants & redox signaling2015

Reactive Oxygen-Related Diseases: Therapeutic Targets and Emerging Clinical Indications.

Ana I Casas, V Thao-Vi Dao, Andreas Daiber, Ghassan J Maghzal, Fabio Di Lisa, Nina Kaludercic, Sonia Leach, Antonio Cuadrado, Vincent Jaquet, Tamara Seredenina and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants & redox signaling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Microbes and the fate of neutrophils.Immunological reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ana I Casas1 Department of Pharmacology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , Maastricht, the Netherlands .
V Thao-Vi Dao1 Department of Pharmacology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , Maastricht, the Netherlands .
Andreas Daiber2 2nd Medical Department, Molecular Cardiology, University Medical Center , Mainz, Germany .
Ghassan J Maghzal3 Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, and School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .
Fabio Di Lisa4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova , Italy .
Nina Kaludercic5 Neuroscience Institute , CNR, Padova, Italy .
Sonia Leach6 Brighton and Sussex Medical School , Falmer, United Kingdom .
Antonio Cuadrado7 Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED), ISCIII, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" UAM-CSIC, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Paz (IdiPaz), Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid , Madrid, Spain .
Vincent Jaquet8 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland .
Tamara Seredenina8 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland .
Karl H Krause8 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Medical School, University of Geneva , Geneva, Switzerland .
Manuela G López9 Teofilo Hernando Institute, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine. Autonomous University of Madrid , Madrid, Spain .
Roland Stocker3 Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, and School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .
Pietro Ghezzi6 Brighton and Sussex Medical School , Falmer, United Kingdom .
Harald H H W Schmidt1 Department of Pharmacology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University , Maastricht, the Netherlands .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceEnhanced levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been associated with different disease states. Most attempts to validate and exploit these associations by chronic antioxidant therapies have provided disappointing results. Hence, the clinical relevance of ROS is still largely unclear. RECENT ADVANCES: We are now beginning to understand the reasons for these failures, which reside in the many important physiological roles of ROS in cell signaling. To exploit ROS therapeutically, it would be essential to define and treat the disease-relevant ROS at the right moment and leave physiological ROS formation intact. This breakthrough seems now within reach. CRITICAL ISSUES: Rather than antioxidants, a new generation of protein targets for classical pharmacological agents includes ROS-forming or toxifying enzymes or proteins that are oxidatively damaged and can be functionally repaired. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Linking these target proteins in future to specific disease states and providing in each case proof of principle will be essential for translating the oxidative stress concept into the clinic.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsHumansMonoamine OxidaseNADPH OxidasesNitric OxideNitric Oxide SynthaseOxidative StressPeroxidaseReactive Oxygen SpeciesXanthine OxidaseAntioxidantsMonoamine OxidaseNADPH OxidasesNitric OxideNitric Oxide SynthasePeroxidaseReactive Oxygen SpeciesXanthine Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID26583264
PMCPMC4657512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.