Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26583124›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2015

Revisiting the Posttherapeutic Cure Criterion in Chagas Disease: Time for New Methods, More Questions, Doubts, and Polemics or Time to Change Old Concepts?

Marta de Lana, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence of Chagas heart disease in dilated cardiomyopathy.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2020
    Observational
  7. Lychnopholide in Poly(d,l-Lactide)-Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta de LanaDepartamento de Análises Clínicas, Escola de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Programas de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas (NUPEB)) e Ciências Farmacêuticas (CiPHARMA), Escola de Farmácia, UFOP, 35400-000 Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Olindo Assis Martins-FilhoLaboratório de Biomarcadores de Diagnóstico e Monitoração, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou (CPqRR), Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most relevant issues beyond the effectiveness of etiological treatment of Chagas disease is the lack of consensual/feasible tools to identify and certify the definitive parasitological cure. Several methods of distinct natures (parasitological, serological, and molecular) have been continuously proposed and novel perspectives are currently under investigation. Although the simultaneous use of distinct tests may offer better contributions and advances, it also leads to controversies of interpretation, with lack of mutual consent of cure criterion amongst researchers and physicians. In fact, when distinct host compartments (blood/tissues) are evaluated and explored, novel questions may arise due to the nature and sensitivity limit of each test. This short analytical review intends to present a chronological and critical overview and discuss the state-of-the-art distinct devices available for posttherapeutic cure assessment in Chagas disease, their contributions, meanings, and interpretation, aiming to point out the major gaps and propose novel insight for future perspectives of posttherapeutic management of Chagas disease patients.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseDisease ManagementHumansNitroimidazolesSerologic TestsTrypanosoma cruziNitroimidazoles

Identifiers

PMID26583124
PMCPMC4637035
OpenAlexW2130125573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.