Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26583019›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Transcriptome analysis reveals regulatory networks underlying differential susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in response to nitrogen availability in Solanum lycopersicum.

Andrea Vega, Paulo Canessa, Gustavo Hoppe, Ignacio Retamal, Tomas C Moyano, Javier Canales, Rodrigo A Gutiérrez, Joselyn Rubilar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptome analysis of tea (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea VegaFacultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile ; Millennium Nucleus Center for Plant Systems and Synthetic Biology Santiago, Chile.
Paulo CanessaDepartamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile ; Millennium Nucleus for Fungal Integrative and Synthetic Biology Santiago, Chile.
Gustavo HoppeFacultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile ; Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile.
Ignacio RetamalFacultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile.
Tomas C MoyanoMillennium Nucleus Center for Plant Systems and Synthetic Biology Santiago, Chile ; Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile.
Javier CanalesFacultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Bioquímica y Microbiología, Universidad Austral de Chile Valdivia, Chile.
Rodrigo A GutiérrezMillennium Nucleus Center for Plant Systems and Synthetic Biology Santiago, Chile ; Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile.
Joselyn RubilarFacultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Chile.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLAustral University of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is one of the main limiting nutrients for plant growth and crop yield. It is well documented that changes in nitrate availability, the main N source found in agricultural soils, influences a myriad of developmental programs and processes including the plant defense response. Indeed, many agronomical reports indicate that the plant N nutritional status influences their ability to respond effectively when challenged by different pathogens. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in N-modulation of plant susceptibility to pathogens are poorly characterized. In this work, we show that Solanum lycopersicum defense response to the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea is affected by plant N availability, with higher susceptibility in nitrate-limiting conditions. Global gene expression responses of tomato against B. cinerea under contrasting nitrate conditions reveals that plant primary metabolism is affected by the fungal infection regardless of N regimes. This result suggests that differential susceptibility to pathogen attack under contrasting N conditions is not only explained by a metabolic alteration. We used a systems biology approach to identify the transcriptional regulatory network implicated in plant response to the fungus infection under contrasting nitrate conditions. Interestingly, hub genes in this network are known key transcription factors involved in ethylene and jasmonic acid signaling. This result positions these hormones as key integrators of nitrate and defense against B. cinerea in tomato plants. Our results provide insights into potential crosstalk mechanisms between necrotrophic defense response and N status in plants.

Indexed as

defense mechanismsethylene signalinggene network analysisjasmonic acidmicroarray analysisnitrate nutritiontomato

Identifiers

PMID26583019
PMCPMC4631835
OpenAlexW2179878064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.