Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26583008›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Comparative metagenomics reveals impact of contaminants on groundwater microbiomes.

Christopher L Hemme, Qichao Tu, Zhou Shi, Yujia Qin, Weimin Gao, Ye Deng, Joy D Van Nostrand, Liyou Wu, Zhili He, Patrick S G Chain and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Distribution of Antibiotic-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. A marine plasmid hitchhiking vast phylogenetic and geographic distances.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Christopher L HemmeInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Qichao TuInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Zhou ShiInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Yujia QinInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Weimin GaoThe Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe AZ, USA.
Ye DengInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA ; CAS Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China.
Joy D Van NostrandInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Liyou WuInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Zhili HeInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA.
Patrick S G ChainBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos NM, USA.
Susannah G TringeUnited States Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek CA, USA.
Matthew W FieldsDepartment of Microbiology, Montana State University, Bozeman MT, USA.
Edward M RubinUnited States Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek CA, USA.
James M TiedjeCenter for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, USA.
Terry C HazenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville TN, USA ; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville TN, USA ; Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville TN, USA ; Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN, USA.
Adam P ArkinDepartment of Bioengineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA, USA.
Jizhong ZhouInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman OK, USA ; Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley CA, USA ; State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand patterns of geochemical cycling in pristine versus contaminated groundwater ecosystems, pristine shallow groundwater (FW301) and contaminated groundwater (FW106) samples from the Oak Ridge Integrated Field Research Center (OR-IFRC) were sequenced and compared to each other to determine phylogenetic and metabolic difference between the communities. Proteobacteria (e.g., Burkholderia, Pseudomonas) are the most abundant lineages in the pristine community, though a significant proportion ( >55%) of the community is composed of poorly characterized low abundance (individually <1%) lineages. The phylogenetic diversity of the pristine community contributed to a broader diversity of metabolic networks than the contaminated community. In addition, the pristine community encodes redundant and mostly complete geochemical cycles distributed over multiple lineages and appears capable of a wide range of metabolic activities. In contrast, many geochemical cycles in the contaminated community appear truncated or minimized due to decreased biodiversity and dominance by Rhodanobacter populations capable of surviving the combination of stresses at the site. These results indicate that the pristine site contains more robust and encodes more functional redundancy than the stressed community, which contributes to more efficient nutrient cycling and adaptability than the stressed community.

Indexed as

bioremediationgroundwater microbiologymetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID26583008
PMCPMC4628106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.