Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26582986›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2015

Categorical discrimination of human body parts by magnetoencephalography.

Misaki Nakamura, Takufumi Yanagisawa, Yumiko Okamura, Ryohei Fukuma, Masayuki Hirata, Toshihiko Araki, Yukiyasu Kamitani, Shiro Yorifuji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Misaki NakamuraDepartment of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan.
Takufumi YanagisawaDepartment of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan ; Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan ; Department of Neuroinformatics, ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories Kyoto, Japan ; Japan Science and Technology Agency, Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology Osaka, Japan.
Yumiko OkamuraDepartment of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan.
Ryohei FukumaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan ; Department of Neuroinformatics, ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories Kyoto, Japan ; Graduate School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology Ikoma, Japan.
Masayuki HirataDepartment of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan ; Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan.
Toshihiko ArakiDepartment of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan.
Yukiyasu KamitaniDepartment of Neuroinformatics, ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories Kyoto, Japan ; Graduate School of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology Ikoma, Japan ; Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan.
Shiro YorifujiDepartment of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans recognize body parts in categories. Previous studies have shown that responses in the fusiform body area (FBA) and extrastriate body area (EBA) are evoked by the perception of the human body, when presented either as whole or as isolated parts. These responses occur approximately 190 ms after body images are visualized. The extent to which body-sensitive responses show specificity for different body part categories remains to be largely clarified. We used a decoding method to quantify neural responses associated with the perception of different categories of body parts. Nine subjects underwent measurements of their brain activities by magnetoencephalography (MEG) while viewing 14 images of feet, hands, mouths, and objects. We decoded categories of the presented images from the MEG signals using a support vector machine (SVM) and calculated their accuracy by 10-fold cross-validation. For each subject, a response that appeared to be a body-sensitive response was observed and the MEG signals corresponding to the three types of body categories were classified based on the signals in the occipitotemporal cortex. The accuracy in decoding body-part categories (with a peak at approximately 48%) was above chance (33.3%) and significantly higher than that for random categories. According to the time course and location, the responses are suggested to be body-sensitive and to include information regarding the body-part category. Finally, this non-invasive method can decode category information of a visual object with high temporal and spatial resolution and this result may have a significant impact in the field of brain-machine interface research.

Indexed as

body perceptioncategorizationdecodingmagnetoencephalographyvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID26582986
PMCPMC4631816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.