Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26582980›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2015

Optogenetic silencing of locus coeruleus activity in mice impairs cognitive flexibility in an attentional set-shifting task.

Kathrin Janitzky, Michael T Lippert, Achim Engelhorn, Jennifer Tegtmeier, Jürgen Goldschmidt, Hans-Jochen Heinze, Frank W Ohl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin JanitzkyDepartment of Neurology, University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany ; Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael T LippertSystems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Achim EngelhornSystems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Jennifer TegtmeierSystems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany.
Jürgen GoldschmidtSystems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg, Germany.
Hans-Jochen HeinzeDepartment of Neurology, University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany ; Systems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg, Germany.
Frank W OhlSystems Physiology of Learning, Leibniz Institute of Neurobiology Magdeburg, Germany ; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences Magdeburg, Germany ; Systems Physiology, Institute of Biology, University of Magdeburg Magdeburg, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology · DECenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The locus coeruleus (LC) is the sole source of noradrenergic projections to the cortex and essential for attention-dependent cognitive processes. In this study we used unilateral optogenetic silencing of the LC in an attentional set-shifting task (ASST) to evaluate the influence of the LC on prefrontal cortex-dependent functions in mice. We expressed the halorhodopsin eNpHR 3.0 to reversibly silence LC activity during task performance, and found that silencing selectively impaired learning of those parts of the ASST that most strongly rely on cognitive flexibility. In particular, extra-dimensional set-shifting (EDS) and reversal learning was impaired, suggesting an involvement of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the orbitofrontal cortex. In contrast, those parts of the task that are less dependent on cognitive flexibility, i.e., compound discrimination (CD) and the intra-dimensional shifts (IDS) were not affected. Furthermore, attentional set formation was unaffected by LC silencing. Our results therefore suggest a modulatory influence of the LC on cognitive flexibility, mediated by different frontal networks.

Indexed as

attentional set-shifting taskB6.Cg-Tg(Th-cre)1Tmd/J hemizygous micecognitive flexibilityextra-dimensional set-shiftinghalorhodopsinlocus coeruleusoptogeneticsprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID26582980
PMCPMC4631833
OpenAlexW1892320282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.