Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26582583›Full record

ArticleJournal of cell communication and signaling2016

Subcellular localization of EGFR in esophageal carcinoma cell lines.

Lucas Spohn, Christiane Fichter, Martin Werner, Silke Lassmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cell communication and signaling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas SpohnInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Breisacherstrasse 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Christiane FichterInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Breisacherstrasse 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin WernerInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Breisacherstrasse 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Silke LassmannInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, Breisacherstrasse 115A, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. silke.lassmann@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EGF receptor is a therapeutic target in cancer cells, whereby mutations of EGFR and/or signalling members act as predictive markers. EGFR however also exhibits dynamic changes of subcellular localization, leading to STAT5 complex formation, nuclear translocation and induction of Aurora-A expression in squamous cancer cells. We previously described high EGFR and Aurora-A expression in esophageal cancer cells. Here, we investigated subcellular localization of EGFR and STAT5 in esophageal cancer cells.

resultsQuantitative immunofluorescence analyses of four esophageal cancer cell lines reflecting esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC) revealed that the subcellular localization of EGFR was shifted from a membranous to cytoplasmic localization upon EGF-stimulation in OE21 (ESCC) cells. Thereby, EGFR in part co-localized with E-Cadherin. In parallel, phosphorylated STAT5-Tyr694 appeared to increase in the nucleus and to decrease at the cell membrane. In three additional cell lines, EGFR was only marginally (Kyse-410/ESCC; OE19/EAC) and weakly (OE33, EAC) detectable at the cell membrane. Partial co-localization of EGFR and E-Cadherin occurred in OE33 cells. Post EGF-stimulation, EGFR was detected in the cytoplasm, resembling endosomal compartments. Furthermore, OE19 and OE33 exhibited nuclear STAT5-Tyr694 phosphorylation upon EGF-stimulation. None of the four cell lines showed nuclear EGFR expression and localization.

conclusionIn contrast to other (squamous) cancer cells, activation of EGFR in esophageal squamous cancer cells does not result in nuclear translocation of EGFR. Still, the subcellular localization of EGFR may influence STAT5-associated signaling pathways in esophageal cancer cells and hence possibly also the responses to ErbB, respective EGFR-targeted therapies.

Indexed as

EGFREsophageal cancer cellsSTAT5Subcellular localization

Identifiers

PMID26582583
PMCPMC4850139
OpenAlexW2244371977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.