Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26582418›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2015

How to model temporal changes in comorbidity for cancer patients using prospective cohort data.

Lars Lindhagen, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, David Robinson, Pär Stattin, Hans Garmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lars LindhagenUppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mieke Van HemelrijckDivision of Cancer Studies, Cancer Epidemiology Group, Research Oncology, King's College London, School of Medicine, 3rd Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
David RobinsonDepartment of Urology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jonkoping, Sweden.
Pär StattinDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Hans GarmoDivision of Cancer Studies, Cancer Epidemiology Group, Research Oncology, King's College London, School of Medicine, 3rd Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK. hans.garmo@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of comorbid conditions is strongly related to survival and also affects treatment choices in cancer patients. This comorbidity is often quantified by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using specific weights (1, 2, 3, or 6) for different comorbidities. It has been shown that the CCI increases at different times and with different sizes, so that traditional time to event analysis is not adequate to assess these temporal changes. Here, we present a method to model temporal changes in CCI in cancer patients using data from PCBaSe Sweden, a nation-wide population-based prospective cohort of men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Our proposed model is based on the assumption that a change in comorbidity, as quantified by the CCI, is an irreversible one-way process, i.e., CCI accumulates over time and cannot decrease.

methodsCCI was calculated based on 17 disease categories, which were defined using ICD-codes for discharge diagnoses in the National Patient Register. A state transition model in discrete time steps (i.e., four weeks) was applied to capture all changes in CCI. The transition probabilities were estimated from three modelling steps: 1) Logistic regression model for vital status, 2) Logistic regression model to define any changes in CCI, and 3) Poisson regression model to determine the size of CCI change, with an additional logistic regression model for CCI changes ≥ 6. The four models combined yielded parameter estimates to calculate changes in CCI with their confidence intervals.

resultsThese methods were applied to men with low-risk prostate cancer who received active surveillance (AS), radical prostatectomy (RP), or curative radiotherapy (RT) as primary treatment. There were large differences in CCI changes according to treatment.

conclusionsOur method to model temporal changes in CCI efficiently captures changes in comorbidity over time with a small number of regression analyses to perform - which would be impossible with tradition time to event analyses. However, our approach involves a simulation step that is not yet included in standard statistical software packages. In our prostate cancer example we showed that there are large differences in development of comorbidities among men receiving different treatments for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

ComorbidityModels, StatisticalAgedCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesSwedenTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26582418
PMCPMC4652373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.