Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26582358›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2015

Mathematical Model of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Responses to Umbilical Cord Occlusions in Fetal Sheep.

Qiming Wang, Nathan Gold, Martin G Frasch, Huaxiong Huang, Marc Thiriet, Xiaogang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiming WangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Nathan GoldDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
Martin G FraschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
Huaxiong HuangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. hhuang@yorku.ca.
Marc ThirietUPMC, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, CNRS, UMR 7598, INRIA, EPI REO, Sorbonne University, 75252, Paris, France.
Xiaogang WangDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 111424-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal acidemia during labor is associated with an increased risk of brain injury and lasting neurological deficits. This is in part due to the repetitive occlusions of the umbilical cord (UCO) induced by uterine contractions. Whereas fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is widely used clinically, it fails to detect fetal acidemia. Hence, new approaches are needed for early detection of fetal acidemia during labor. We built a mathematical model of the UCO effects on FHR, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), oxygenation and metabolism. Mimicking fetal experiments, our in silico model reproduces salient features of experimentally observed fetal cardiovascular and metabolic behavior including FHR overshoot, gradual MABP decrease and mixed metabolic and respiratory acidemia during UCO. Combined with statistical analysis, our model provides valuable insight into the labor-like fetal distress and guidance for refining FHR monitoring algorithms to improve detection of fetal acidemia and cardiovascular decompensation.

Indexed as

AcidosisAnimalsBlood PressureConstriction, PathologicFemaleFetusHeart Rate, FetalMathematical ConceptsModels, AnimalModels, CardiovascularPregnancySheepUmbilical CordUterine ContractionFetal acidemiaFetal blood circulationHemodynamicsLaborMathematical modelingNeural controlSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID26582358
PMCPMC5359013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.