ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2015
[Detection and Analysis of EGFR and KRAS Mutation with Lung Adenocarcinoma].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of anticarcinogenic properties of Viburnum opulus and its active compound p-coumaric acid on human colorectal carcinoma.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2020Article
- [Advances in Lymph Node Metastasis and Lymph Node Dissection in Early Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2019Review
- [EGFR and KRAS Gene Mutations in 754 Patients with Resectable Stage I-IIIa Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Its Clinical Significance].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017Article
- [Gene Expression and Clinical Characteristics of Molecular Targeted Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Shandong].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017Article
- [Clinical Analysis of 107 NSCLC Patients Harboring KRAS Mutation].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveMutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS are important markers in non-small cell lung cancer, which are closely related to the clinical therapeutic effect. To analysis the EGFR and KRAS gene mutation rate and its relationship with clinical features in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
methods395 patients with treatment naïve lung adenocarcinoma, tumor tissue samples were available for testing. Tumor sample EGFR and KRAS mutation status were detected using mutant enriched liquidchip.
results395 cases of lung adenocarcinoma, EGFR mutations were detected in 192 cases (48.9%), KRAS mutations were detected in 29 cases (7.8%), and the presence of EGFR and KRAS mutation were detected in 1 case (0.3%). EGFR mutations were found to occur significantly more often in female than in male patients (62.0% vs 37.1%, P<0.001) and in never smokers than in smokers (61.9% vs 30.3%, P<0.001), no significant differences were observed in age, stage and different biopsy type. KRAS mutations were not found to have statistical significance (P>0.05) in each clinical factors, only occurred in the wild type EGFR gene in patients (13.5%, 27/200) was significantly higher than that of patients with EGFR mutation (1.0%, 2/192), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).
conclusionsIn lung adenocarcinomas, EGFR mutation was higher in female and non-smoking patients, KRAS mutation only in patients with wild-type EGFR gene was higher. Before using TKI targeted therapy, EGFR and KRAS mutations should be detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.