Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26581836›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2016

Comparison of clinical periodontal status among habitual smokeless-tobacco users and cigarette smokers.

Varun Kulkarni, Juhi Raju Uttamani, Neel B Bhatavadekar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Permanence of Modifications in Oral Microcirculation in Ex-Smokers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Varun KulkarniDepartment of Periodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Juhi Raju UttamaniDepartment of Periodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Neel B BhatavadekarClarus Dental Specialities, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimInvestigating the comparative effect of cigarette smoking and smokeless-tobacco use on periodontal health.

backgroundThere is a dearth of studies comparing the effects of smoking and smokeless tobacco on periodontal health. Smokeless tobacco is emerging as a major public health hazard, but is often neglected as a risk factor by many clinicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional study of 286 subjects was conducted. The participants were divided into mutually exclusive groups (i.e. any subject who had the habit of both smoking as well as smokeless tobacco usage was excluded from the study), as follows: a smoking group (SG; n=121); a smokeless-tobacco group (ST; n=81); and a non-tobacco-consuming group (NT; n=84). Data were obtained using a questionnaire and by clinical examination. The Periodontal Disease Index (PDI) and Oral Hygiene Index-Simplified (OHI-S) were used to clinically evaluate the periodontal and dental health status of the subjects. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify statistical correlations.

resultsThe Plaque Index was higher in the ST group than in the SG group and was statistically significantly higher in the ST group than in the NT group. Probing depth and gingival inflammation (components of the PDI) were also higher in the ST group than in the SG and NT groups, but this was not statistically significant.

conclusionsWithin the limits of the study, and for this study population, the impact on the periodontium as a result of smokeless tobacco use appeared to be comparable with that of smoking tobacco. The results of this study affirm the need to consider smokeless tobacco as a possible contributory factor to periodontal disease, in addition to smoking, and to counsel patients accordingly. Further randomised clinical trials are necessary to validate the long-term impact of smokeless tobacco on periodontal disease.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedOral HygienePeriodontal DiseasesRisk FactorsSmokingSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco, Smokelessoral hygiene statusperiodontal diseaseruralSmokeless tobaccosmoking

Identifiers

PMID26581836
PMCPMC9376551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.