Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26581504›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2016

Does impulsivity change rate dependently following stimulant administration? A translational selective review and re-analysis.

W K Bickel, A J Quisenberry, S E Snider

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The enduring legacy of Peter B. Dews: Rate-dependency and impulsive choice.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Future Thinking Priming Especially Effective at Modifying Delay Discounting Rates among Cigarette Smokers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cognition and addiction
.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  15. Working Memory Training Improves Alcohol Users' Episodic Future Thinking: A Rate-Dependent Analysis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Return of Rate Dependence.Behavior analysis (Washington, D.C.) · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W K BickelAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA. wkbickel@vtc.vt.edu.
A J QuisenberryAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.
S E SniderAddiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.

Funding

Inter-Temporal Trade-offs in the Risky Decisions of Cocaine AddictsR01DA030241 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, MONTAGUE, P READ · 2010 to 2014
$3.6M
Self-Control Improvement Intervention (SCII): Improving Abstinence in SmokersR01DA034755 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
The Repair of Self Control in Alcohol Dependence: Working Memory & Real Time fMRIR01AA021529 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, LACONTE, STEPHEN M · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021529NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA021529NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034755NIDA NIH HHS R01DA034755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleRate dependence refers to an orderly relationship between a baseline measure of behavior and the change in that behavior following an intervention. The most frequently observed rate-dependent effect is an inverse relationship between the baseline rate of behavior and response rates following an intervention. A previous report of rate dependence in delay discounting suggests that the discounting of delayed reinforcers, and perhaps, other impulsivity measures, may change rate dependently following acute and chronic administration of potentially therapeutic medications in both preclinical and clinical studies.

objectiveThe aim of the current paper was to review the effects of stimulants on delay discounting and other impulsivity tasks.

methodsAll studies identified from the literature were required to include (1) an objective measure of impulsivity; (2) administration of amphetamine, methylphenidate, or modafinil; (3) presentation of a pre- and postdrug administration impulsivity measure; and (4) the report of individual drug effects or results in groups split by baseline or vehicle impulsivity. Twenty-five research reports were then reanalyzed for evidence consistent with rate dependence.

resultsOf the total possible instances, 67 % produced results consistent with rate dependence. Specifically, 72, 45, and 80 % of the data sets were consistent with rate dependence following amphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil administration, respectively.

conclusionsThese results suggest that rate dependence is a more robust phenomenon than reported in the literature. Impulsivity studies should consider this quantitative signature as a process to determine the effects of variables and as a potential prognostic tool to evaluate the effectiveness of future interventions.

Indexed as

AmphetamineBenzhydryl CompoundsCentral Nervous System StimulantsClinical Trials as TopicHumansImpulsive BehaviorMethylphenidateModafinilAmphetamineBenzhydryl CompoundsCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateModafinilAddictionAmphetamineImpulsivityMethylphenidateModafinilPsychostimulantsRate dependence

Identifiers

PMID26581504
PMCPMC4703435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.