ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2016
Quantitative Ultrasound for Nondestructive Characterization of Engineered Tissues and Biomaterials.
Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing tendon microstructure using metrics associated with the angular dependence of ultrasound backscatter.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- In vivo acoustic patterning of endothelial cells for tissue vascularization.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Laser-generated focused ultrasound transducer using a perforated photoacoustic lens for tissue characterization.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Resonant acoustic rheometry for non-contact characterization of viscoelastic biomaterials.Biomaterials · 2021Article
- Developing a Quantitative Ultrasound Image Feature Analysis Scheme to Assess Tumor Treatment Efficacy Using a Mouse Model.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Multimodal Label-Free Imaging for Detecting Maturation of Engineered Osteogenic Grafts.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2019Article
- Predicting in vivo behavior of injectable, in situ-forming drug-delivery systems.Therapeutic delivery · 2017Article
- Ultrasound patterning technologies for studying vascular morphogenesis in 3D.Journal of cell science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive, non-destructive technologies for imaging and quantitatively monitoring the development of artificial tissues are critical for the advancement of tissue engineering. Current standard techniques for evaluating engineered tissues, including histology, biochemical assays and mechanical testing, are destructive approaches. Ultrasound is emerging as a valuable tool for imaging and quantitatively monitoring the properties of engineered tissues and biomaterials longitudinally during fabrication and post-implantation. Ultrasound techniques are rapid, non-invasive, non-destructive and can be easily integrated into sterile environments necessary for tissue engineering. Furthermore, high-frequency quantitative ultrasound techniques can enable volumetric characterization of the structural, biological, and mechanical properties of engineered tissues during fabrication and post-implantation. This review provides an overview of ultrasound imaging, quantitative ultrasound techniques, and elastography, with representative examples of applications of these ultrasound-based techniques to the field of tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.