Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26581230›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2015

Reduced Worries of Hypoglycaemia, High Satisfaction, and Increased Perceived Ease of Use after Experiencing Four Nights of MD-Logic Artificial Pancreas at Home (DREAM4).

Claudia Ziegler, Alon Liberman, Revital Nimri, Ido Muller, Simona Klemenčič, Nataša Bratina, Sarah Bläsig, Kerstin Remus, Moshe Phillip, Tadej Battelino and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving patient self-care using diabetes technologies.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Claudia ZieglerDiabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Alon LibermanThe Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel.
Revital NimriThe Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel.
Ido MullerThe Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel.
Simona KlemenčičDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Medical Centre-University Children's Hospital, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nataša BratinaDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Medical Centre-University Children's Hospital, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sarah BläsigDiabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Kerstin RemusDiabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Moshe PhillipThe Jesse Z and Sara Lea Shafer Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, National Center for Childhood Diabetes, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, 49202 Petah Tikva, Israel.
Tadej BattelinoDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University Medical Centre-University Children's Hospital, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Olga KordonouriDiabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Thomas DanneDiabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Karin LangeDepartment of Medical Psychology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study assesses the impact of using an AP-system at home on fear of hypoglycaemia. In addition, satisfaction and acceptance of the new technology are evaluated.

methodsIn a multicentre, multinational study of 75 patients using the MD-Logic AP during four consecutive nights in home setting 59 of them (aged 10-54 years, 54% male, HbA1c 7.89 ± 0.69% [62.72 ± 7.51 mmol/mol], diabetes duration 11.6 ± 8.4 yrs) answered standardized questionnaires (HFS, adapted TAM, and AP satisfaction) before and after using the AP.

resultsAfter experiencing the AP in home setting worries of hypoglycaemia were significantly reduced (before 1.04 ± 0.53 versus after 0.90 ± 0.63; P = 0.017). Perceived ease of use as a measure of acceptance with the AP significantly increased after personal experience (before 4.64 ± 0.94 versus after 5.06 ± 1.09; P = 0.002). The overall satisfaction mean score after using the AP was 3.02 ± 0.54 (range 0-4), demonstrating a high level of satisfaction with this technology.

conclusionsThe four-night home-based experience of using MD Logic AP was associated with reduced worries of hypoglycaemia, high level of satisfaction, and increased perceived ease of use of the new technology in children, adolescents, and adults.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAnxietyBlood GlucoseChildDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMiddle AgedPancreas, ArtificialYoung AdultBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID26581230
PMCPMC4637058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.