Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26581221›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016

Nitroheterocyclic drug resistance mechanisms in Trypanosoma brucei.

Susan Wyllie, Bernardo J Foth, Anna Kelner, Antoaneta Y Sokolova, Matthew Berriman, Alan H Fairlamb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Old drugs, new weapons: current trends in repurposing therapies against antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cytological profiling of trypanocidal principles fromPhytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan WyllieDivision of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Wellcome Trust Building, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK.
Bernardo J FothWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Anna KelnerDivision of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Wellcome Trust Building, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK.
Antoaneta Y SokolovaDivision of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Wellcome Trust Building, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK.
Matthew BerrimanWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK.
Alan H FairlambDivision of Biological Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Wellcome Trust Building, College of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, Scotland, UK a.h.fairlamb@dundee.ac.uk.
Wellcome Trust · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilWellcome Trust 079838Wellcome Trust 098051Wellcome Trust 100476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this study was to identify the mechanisms of resistance to nifurtimox and fexinidazole in African trypanosomes.

methodsBloodstream-form Trypanosoma brucei were selected for resistance to nifurtimox and fexinidazole by stepwise exposure to increasing drug concentrations. Clones were subjected to WGS to identify putative resistance genes. Transgenic parasites modulating expression of genes of interest were generated and drug susceptibility phenotypes determined.

resultsNifurtimox-resistant (NfxR) and fexinidazole-resistant (FxR) parasites shared reciprocal cross-resistance suggestive of a common mechanism of action. Previously, a type I nitroreductase (NTR) has been implicated in nitro drug activation. WGS of resistant clones revealed that NfxR parasites had lost >100 kb from one copy of chromosome 7, rendering them hemizygous for NTR as well as over 30 other genes. FxR parasites retained both copies of NTR, but lost >70 kb downstream of one NTR allele, decreasing NTR transcription by half. A single knockout line of NTR displayed 1.6- and 1.9-fold resistance to nifurtimox and fexinidazole, respectively. Since NfxR and FxR parasites are ∼6- and 20-fold resistant to nifurtimox and fexinidazole, respectively, additional factors must be involved. Overexpression and knockout studies ruled out a role for a putative oxidoreductase (Tb927.7.7410) and a hypothetical gene (Tb927.1.1050), previously identified in a genome-scale RNAi screen.

conclusionsNTR was confirmed as a key resistance determinant, either by loss of one gene copy or loss of gene expression. Further work is required to identify which of the many dozens of SNPs identified in the drug-resistant cell lines contribute to the overall resistance phenotype.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceAntiprotozoal AgentsGenome, ProtozoanNifurtimoxNitroimidazolesNitroreductasesParasitic Sensitivity TestsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNATrypanosoma brucei bruceiAntiprotozoal Agentsaromatic NADH-dependent nitroreductasefexinidazoleNifurtimoxNitroimidazolesNitroreductases

Identifiers

PMID26581221
PMCPMC4743696
OpenAlexW2227520693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.