ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015
Characterization of the three-dimensional free energy manifold for the uracil ribonucleoside from asynchronous replica exchange simulations.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- FE-ToolKit: A Versatile Software Suite for Analysis of High-Dimensional Free Energy Surfaces and Alchemical Free Energy Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2018Article
- A generalized linear response framework for expanded ensemble and replica exchange simulations.The Journal of chemical physics · 2018Article
- RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- A Multidimensional B-Spline Correction for Accurate Modeling Sugar Puckering in QM/MM Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2017Article
- Asynchronous Replica Exchange Software for Grid and Heterogeneous Computing.Computer physics communications · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Replica exchange molecular dynamics has emerged as a powerful tool for efficiently sampling free energy landscapes for conformational and chemical transitions. However, daunting challenges remain in efficiently getting such simulations to scale to the very large number of replicas required to address problems in state spaces beyond two dimensions. The development of enabling technology to carry out such simulations is in its infancy, and thus it remains an open question as to which applications demand extension into higher dimensions. In the present work, we explore this problem space by applying asynchronous Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics with a combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical potential to explore the conformational space for a simple ribonucleoside. This is done using a newly developed software framework capable of executing >3,000 replicas with only enough resources to run 2,000 simultaneously. This may not be possible with traditional synchronous replica exchange approaches. Our results demonstrate 1.) the necessity of high dimensional sampling simulations for biological systems, even as simple as a single ribonucleoside, and 2.) the utility of asynchronous exchange protocols in managing simultaneous resource requirements expected in high dimensional sampling simulations. It is expected that more complicated systems will only increase in computational demand and complexity, and thus the reported asynchronous approach may be increasingly beneficial in order to make such applications available to a broad range of computational scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.