Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26580633›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Coping with Workplace Violence in Healthcare Settings: Social Support and Strategies.

Siqi Zhao, He Liu, Hongkun Ma, Mingli Jiao, Ye Li, Yanhua Hao, Yihua Sun, Lijun Gao, Sun Hong, Zheng Kang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Siqi ZhaoDepartment of Health. Policy and Hospital Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. siqizhao1992@foxmail.com.
He LiuDepartment of Health. Policy and Hospital Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. lhhh314@126.com.
Hongkun MaDepartment of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. mahongkun222@sohu.com.
Mingli JiaoDepartment of Health. Policy and Hospital Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. minglijiao@126.com.
Ye LiDepartment of Health. Policy and Hospital Management, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. Liye19832014@126.com.
Yanhua HaoDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. hyhyjw@126.com.
Yihua SunHuman Resources Department, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai 200030, China. sunyihua2014@126.com.
Lijun GaoDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. Lijungao2014@126.com.
Sun HongDepartment of Medical Demography, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. sunhong19652014@126.com.
Zheng KangDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. zhengkang1983@126.com.
Qunhong WuDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. qunhongwu@126.com.
Hong QiaoEndocrine and Metabolic Diseases, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China. qiaoh0823@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals from 19 hospitals in six cities of Heilongjiang Province, China was conducted. This study had two objectives: (1) to examine the factors influencing healthcare workers' opinions of strategies to prevent workplace violence, using social support theory, and (2) to encourage healthcare organisations and the larger society to offer greater support to healthcare workers. The respondents exposed to workplace violence expected to receive organisational and social support. Those exposed to psychological violence had a strong opinion of the need for target training to strengthen their competence in responding to violence (OR = 1.319, 95% CI: 1.034-1.658) and enacting workplace violence legislation (OR = 1.968, 95% CI: 1.523-2.543).Those exposed to physical violence thought it might be useful to reinforce staff with back-up support (OR = 3.101, 95% CI: 1.085-8.860). Those exposed to both types of violence and those with high anxiety levels need greater support at both the organisational and societal levels.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAttitude of Health PersonnelSocial SupportAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonnel, HospitalWorkplace Violencehealthcare workerssocial supportstrategiesworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID26580633
PMCPMC4661658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.