Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26580396›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Incident Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Antonio B Fernandez, Gregory A Panza, Benjamin Cramer, Saurav Chatterjee, Ramya Jayaraman, Wen-Chih Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio B FernandezDivision of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Gregory A PanzaDivision of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, United States of America.
Benjamin CramerFrank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, United States of America.
Saurav ChatterjeeSt Luke's-Roosevelt Hospitals of the Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, United States of America.
Ramya JayaramanDepartment of Medicine, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, United States of America.
Wen-Chih WuMedical Service, Providence VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Hartford Financial Services (United States)Brown University · USQuinnipiac University · USSt. Vincent's Medical Center · USTheodore Roosevelt High School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss and blindness in people over 65 years old in the United States and has been associated with cardiovascular risk and decreased survival. There is conflicting data, however, regarding the contribution of AMD to the prediction of stroke.

aimTo determine whether AMD is a risk indicator for incident stroke in a meta-analysis of available prospective and retrospective cohort studies published in the English literature.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search of all studies published in English with Pub Med and other databases from 1966 to August 2014, reporting stroke incidence in patients with macular degeneration. Two investigators independently extracted the data. A random effects model was used to report Odds ratios (OR), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-regression using a mixed linear model was used to understand potential heterogeneity amongst studies.

resultsWe identified 9 studies that reported stroke incidence in patients with and without early AMD (N = 1,420,978). No significant association was found between early AMD with incident stroke. Combined, these 9 studies demonstrated random effects (OR, 1.12; CI, 0.86-1.47; I2 = 96%). Meta-regression on baseline covariates of age, sex, and year of publication did not significantly relate to heterogeneity.

conclusionsWe found no significant relationship between AMD and incident stroke. Further studies are needed to clarify other causes of decreased survival in patients with AMD.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMacular DegenerationMaleOdds RatioProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26580396
PMCPMC4651536
OpenAlexW2280485508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.