ArticleACS nano2016
Electron Microscopy of Living Cells During in Situ Fluorescence Microscopy.
Article in ACS nano, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chitinase-3-like-1: a multifaceted player in neuroinflammation and degenerative pathologies with therapeutic implications.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2025Review
- Flagellotropic Bacteriophages: Opportunities and Challenges for Antimicrobial Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Bimodal endocytic probe for three-dimensional correlative light and electron microscopy.Cell reports methods · 2022Article
- Review: Cantilever-Based Sensors for High Speed Atomic Force Microscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The 2018 correlative microscopy techniques roadmap.Journal of physics D: Applied physics · 2018Review
- Linear Chains of HER2 Receptors Found in the Plasma Membrane Using Liquid-Phase Electron Microscopy.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Graphene Microcapsule Arrays for Combinatorial Electron Microscopy and Spectroscopy in Liquids.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an approach toward dynamic nanoimaging: live fluorescence of cells encapsulated in a bionanoreactor is complemented with in situ scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on an integrated microscope. This allows us to take SEM snapshots on-demand, that is, at a specific location in time, at a desired region of interest, guided by the dynamic fluorescence imaging. We show that this approach enables direct visualization, with EM resolution, of the distribution of bioconjugated quantum dots on cellular extensions during uptake and internalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.